Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Snowflake-Labs/cocoplus --skill chargeback-refreshgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Snowflake-Labs/cocoplusWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/snowflake-labs/cocoplus/chargeback-refresh)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/snowflake-labs/cocoplus/chargeback-refresh"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/snowflake-labs/cocoplus/chargeback-refresh/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/snowflake-labs/cocoplus/chargeback-refresh"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/snowflake-labs/cocoplus/chargeback-refresh.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00310 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00124 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00062 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
chargeback-refresh scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to audit-ci — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Your objective is to perform this V2-native feature behavior using Coco-native capabilities: Read, Write, Edit, Bash when explicitly needed by the host, Snowflake tools when the feature requires data access, and subagents when the feature requires independent review.
Required Contract
- Preserve the artifact paths, schemas, and user-visible outputs documented by the owning feature skill.
- Do not call legacy scripts as the implementation path.
- Prefer deterministic file parsing and structured artifacts over free-form prose when producing machine-readable state.
- If an external side effect would occur, apply the same gate and confirmation semantics as the owning feature.
Exit Criteria
- The owning feature's documented artifact is produced or updated.
- The output schema remains compatible with existing readers.
- No registered runtime script invocation is required.
Anti-Rationalization
| Shortcut / Temptation | Why It Fails |
|---|---|
| Treat the skill as complete because the file exists | Skill contracts must describe observable behavior and verification, not just command names. |
| Skip artifact and safety checks for a small command | Small commands still mutate state or guide execution; preserve the same gates. |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 32 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 06d83363fd85
chargeback-refresh is a skill published in the GitHub repository Snowflake-Labs/cocoplus (728 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 310 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to audit-ci, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.
chargeback-refresh compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| chargeback-refreshSnowflake-Labs/cocoplus | Skill | 728 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 33 | Claude Code, Codex |
| comparable-company-analysiswanxingai/LightAgent | Skill | 1.2k | 14d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 46 | Claude Code, Codex |
| 财经分析工具包wanxingai/LightAgent | Skill | 1.2k | 14d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 35 | Claude Code, Codex |
| business-caseyonatangross/orchestkit | Skill | 301 | today | MIT | A | 37 | Claude Code |
| stripemagnus919/agent-skills | Skill | 174 | 3d ago | MIT | A | 116 | Claude Code, Codex |
| yc-default-alive-calculatormagnus919/agent-skills | Skill | 174 | 3d ago | MIT | A | 54 | Claude Code, Codex |
| financial-analysisdamianvtran/local-operator | Skill | 229 | today | MIT | A | 38 | Claude Code, Codex |