Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Snowflake-Labs/cocoplus --skill cupgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Snowflake-Labs/cocoplusWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/snowflake-labs/cocoplus/cup)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/snowflake-labs/cocoplus/cup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/snowflake-labs/cocoplus/cup/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/snowflake-labs/cocoplus/cup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/snowflake-labs/cocoplus/cup.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.00411 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00205 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00082 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
cup scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Your objective is to manually trigger CocoCupper analysis.
Before proceeding, verify that .cocoplus/ exists.
If not: output "CocoPlus not initialized in this directory. Run $pod init to begin." Then stop.
Activate the coco-cupper subagent with the following context:
- Current lifecycle artifacts in
.cocoplus/lifecycle/ - Current flow.json and stage statuses
- Any quality findings files matching
.cocoplus/quality-findings-*.md - Current memory/decisions.md
The coco-cupper agent will analyze and write findings to .cocoplus/grove/cupper-findings.md.
Output: "CocoCupper analysis complete. Findings written to .cocoplus/grove/cupper-findings.md. Run $cup history to review, or $patterns promote [finding-id] to promote a finding to CocoGrove."
Anti-Rationalization
| Shortcut / Temptation | Why It Fails |
|---|---|
| Run analysis without loading quality findings and memory context | CocoCupper's value comes from cross-referencing lifecycle artifacts — incomplete context produces shallow findings |
| Append to findings file without a unique finding ID | Duplicate or ID-less findings cannot be referenced by $patterns promote and become orphaned |
Exit Criteria
-
.cocoplus/grove/cupper-findings.mdhas been updated with at least one new## Findingsection - Each new finding has a unique ID, Type, Severity, and Date field
- Output confirms analysis completed with a path to findings file
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 38 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 3c6fdb255a95
cup is a skill published in the GitHub repository Snowflake-Labs/cocoplus (720 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 411 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
task-dependency-patterns
Task Management patterns with TaskCreate, TaskUpdate, TaskGet, TaskList tools. Decompose complex work into trackable tasks with dependency chains. Use when managing multi-step implementations, coordinating parallel work, or tracking completion status.
factory-triage
Triage a Factory work item's issue — trace history, understand architecture, diagnose root cause, then advance the stage.
link-ticket-to-session
Link the current Claude Code session to a ticket (Linear, Jira, GitHub Issues, or GitHub Pull Requests) and cache its title/status in karma. Use when the user explicitly asks to link, attach, associate, or connect this session to a ticket, issue, or PR — e.g. "/link-ticket-to-session ABC-123", "link this session to…
herdr-kit-workflows
Set up and operate Herdr Kit safely: install and configure the plugin and Mastra Code integration, manage Review and Work repository scope, open primary repository workspaces, synchronize managers, materialize or dematerialize managed worktrees, and update Herdr Kit settings or shortcuts.
herdr-manager-query
Query the authoritative global Herdr Review and Work Manager inventory, recommend actionable PR work, and explicitly materialize confirmed remote-only Review Manager records through the plugin's stable public CLI.
factory-complete-issue
Mark a GitHub issue as done and update its status labels.