Softaworks Agent Toolkit is a collection of packaged instructions, scripts, agents, and commands that give AI coding assistants reusable procedures for development, documentation, planning, and professional work. Developers install its components individually in compatible coding-agent environments; catalogue entries represent parts of this toolkit.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add softaworks/agent-toolkit --skill commit-workgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/softaworks/agent-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/softaworks/agent-toolkit/commit-work)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/softaworks/agent-toolkit/commit-work"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/softaworks/agent-toolkit/commit-work/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/softaworks/agent-toolkit/commit-work"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/softaworks/agent-toolkit/commit-work.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.00583 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00233 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00117 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00058 |
Grade A, and why
commit-work scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
4 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- commit-work — 100% identical, 22 lines differ
- commit-work — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- commit-work — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- commit-work — 88% identical, 2 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 56 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Commit work
Goal
Make commits that are easy to review and safe to ship:
- only intended changes are included
- commits are logically scoped (split when needed)
- commit messages describe what changed and why
Inputs to ask for (if missing)
- Single commit or multiple commits? (If unsure: default to multiple small commits when there are unrelated changes.)
- Commit style: Conventional Commits are required.
- Any rules: max subject length, required scopes.
Workflow (checklist)
- Inspect the working tree before staging
git statusgit diff(unstaged)- If many changes:
git diff --stat
- Decide commit boundaries (split if needed)
- Split by: feature vs refactor, backend vs frontend, formatting vs logic, tests vs prod code, dependency bumps vs behavior changes.
- If changes are mixed in one file, plan to use patch staging.
- Stage only what belongs in the next commit
- Prefer patch staging for mixed changes:
git add -p - To unstage a hunk/file:
git restore --staged -porgit restore --staged <path>
- Prefer patch staging for mixed changes:
- Review what will actually be committed
git diff --cached- Sanity checks:
- no secrets or tokens
- no accidental debug logging
- no unrelated formatting churn
- Describe the staged change in 1-2 sentences (before writing the message)
- "What changed?" + "Why?"
- If you cannot describe it cleanly, the commit is probably too big or mixed; go back to step 2.
- Write the commit message
- Use Conventional Commits (required):
type(scope): short summary- blank line
- body (what/why, not implementation diary)
- footer (BREAKING CHANGE) if needed
- Prefer an editor for multi-line messages:
git commit -v - Use
references/commit-message-template.mdif helpful.
- Use Conventional Commits (required):
- Run the smallest relevant verification
- Run the repo's fastest meaningful check (unit tests, lint, or build) before moving on.
- Repeat for the next commit until the working tree is clean
Deliverable
Provide:
- the final commit message(s)
- a short summary per commit (what/why)
- the commands used to stage/review (at minimum:
git diff --cached, plus any tests run)
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 56 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 888588ea81b0
commit-work is a skill published in the GitHub repository softaworks/agent-toolkit (2,558 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 583 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
cw-land
Use when turning verified Codewhale work into commits, branches, or a merge: choosing direct-main vs. worktree vs. integration branch, preserving contributor credit, and honoring the gate artifact before merging.
cuga-contributor-workflows
Run CUGA contributor workflows: Conventional Commits, create pull requests against origin with gh and PR templates, and ruff check/format via uv. Use when the user says commit, create a commit, create PR, pull request, open a PR, ruff check, ruff format, or conventional commits.
commit
Stage the appropriate changes and commit them with a Conventional Commits message.
ship-it
A GitHub delivery workflow that commits completed changes, pushes a branch, creates and merges a pull request, and closes the related issue.
commit
A commit candidate is the exact patch that will enter the commit. A coherent change has one task or issue as its reason for existing.
writing-git-commits
Write clear, focused Git commit messages and keep commits easy to review.