Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/softinio/nix-config/github-issuenpx skills add softinio/nix-config --skill github-issuegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/softinio/nix-configWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00072 | $0.04439 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.02219 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00888 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00444 |
Grade C, and why
github-issue scanned grade C with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Recursive force deletehighDestructive command
rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.
rm -rf .claude/worktrees/{issue-number}-{slug} How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 363 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
GitHub Issue Workflow
Full lifecycle skill for working on a GitHub issue: scaffolding, planning, implementation, PR creation, and teardown.
The issue tracker is GitHub itself, driven entirely through the gh CLI — there is no separate tracker to keep in sync. Everything the workflow records (plans, decisions, completion notes) goes on the issue or the PR.
Phase 0 — Issue & Worktree Setup
Phase 0 is mandatory and sequential. Execute Steps 1 → 6 in order, and finish all of them before any Phase 1 exploration or planning.
- At the start of Phase 0, create one task per step (Steps 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) with
TaskCreate, and flip each toin_progressthencompletedas you go. A skipped step must be visibly impossible.- Never silently skip a step. If a step genuinely does not apply, name the step and state why before continuing (e.g. "Step 5: no env setup needed, this repo has no flake").
- The user supplying context up front — base branch, approach, constraints — feeds Step 1.5. It does not authorize jumping ahead to planning; you still run Steps 2 → 6.
- Step 6 is easy to skip. Run
herdr-workspace-layout openbefore leaving Phase 0. It is a no-op outside herdr, so there is no condition to evaluate first.
Step 1: Resolve the issue
If $ARGUMENTS contains an issue number (123, #123) or an issue URL:
gh issue view {number} --json number,title,body,state,labels,assignees,url
- For a URL from another repo, pass
--repo {owner}/{repo}and carry that--repothrough every laterghcall. - Display the issue title and state, and confirm with the user before proceeding.
- If the issue is already closed, say so and ask whether to continue.
If no argument is provided:
- Ask the user for a title and brief description.
- Confirm the target repo (
gh repo view --json nameWithOwnerfor the current one). - Create it, assigned to the user:
gh issue create --title "{title}" --body "{description}" --assignee @me - Confirm the new issue number and URL before continuing.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 363 lines · 72 tokens per session scan C c0a56f288b23
github-issue is a skill published in the GitHub repository softinio/nix-config (11 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 4,439 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 1 finding (recursive force delete). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
technical-writing
Layered technical-writing standard: Diátaxis structure, Google developer style sentences, STE instruction rules, Global English syntax. Use for /technical-writing or when writing or reviewing docs, RFCs, readmes, PR descriptions, or commit messages.
teach
Explain a body of work plainly so a person actually understands it. Runs the how and why skills and weaves what they find into one clear explanation. Use for 'teach me this', 'help me really understand X', 'explain this change or subsystem to me'.
unslop
Cut AI tells from any writing. Must always apply.
quality-code
Standards for writing or modifying handwritten source code. Use when implementing code changes or reviewing handwritten code. Do not use for browsing, explanation, diagnosis without implementation, generated code, or vendored code.
gh-cli
Standardize all GitHub work via gh CLI (repos, issues, PRs, reviews, Actions, labels, releases). Trigger on any GitHub URL (incl. deep links like /pull/123, /issues/123.
code-qa
Review handwritten source code against the quality-code standards. Use only when the user explicitly invokes $code-qa. Do not infer use from an ordinary request to review, inspect, or explain code.