Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add softspark/ai-toolkit --skill quality-gatesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/softspark/ai-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/softspark/ai-toolkit/quality-gates)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/softspark/ai-toolkit/quality-gates"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/softspark/ai-toolkit/quality-gates/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/softspark/ai-toolkit/quality-gates"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/softspark/ai-toolkit/quality-gates.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.00246 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00098 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00049 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00025 |
Grade A, and why
quality-gates scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Quality Gates
This rule comes from app/rules/quality-gates.md in ai-toolkit. It applies to
every task in this workspace, not only when it is loaded.
Quality Gates & Mandatory Practices
MANDATORY PRACTICES
- Plan First: Tasks >1h require Plan, Success Criteria, and Pre-Mortem.
- Quality Gates:
ruff check .(0 errors)mypy --strict src/(0 errors)pytest --cov=src(>70% coverage)- Type Safety: 100% public APIs, >60% internal.
- Security: No secrets in code, sanitization, auth z/n.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 24 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 72aa31e4a17f
quality-gates is a skill published in the GitHub repository softspark/ai-toolkit (180 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 246 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
unit-test
A Go testing workflow for writing unit tests: small tests that check individual functions or components. It supports table-driven cases, where many inputs and expected results are organised in one test, and subtests.
api-integration-test
Create, maintain, and run gated Go integration tests for internal APIs and service-to-service clients (HTTP/gRPC). Use for endpoint verification, contract checks with real runtime config, opt-in execution, timeout/retry safety, and integration failure triage in Go services.
fuzzing-test
A Go testing guide for generating fuzz tests, which repeatedly try varied inputs to find crashes and unexpected behavior. It first checks whether the code is suitable for fuzzing.
load-test
Performance load testing specialist for writing k6/vegeta/wrk scripts, defining SLOs, modeling scenarios (spike/soak/stress/breakpoint), analyzing results, and identifying bottlenecks. ALWAYS use when writing load test scripts, reviewing test results, designing test scenarios, setting performance SLOs, or diagnosing…
e2e-test
Design, maintain, and execute reliable end-to-end tests for critical user journeys with Agent Browser as first choice for exploration and Playwright as the preferred code path for suites and CI. Use for E2E strategy, journey coverage, flaky test triage, artifact collection, CI gating, regression prevention, and…
tdd-workflow
Enforce practical Test-Driven Development for code changes in Go services. Use for new features, bug fixes, refactors, API changes, and new modules. Requires Red-Green-Refactor evidence, defect-hypothesis-driven tests, killer cases, and coverage gates (line + risk-path).