Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/softspark/ai-toolkit/refactornpx skills add softspark/ai-toolkit --skill refactorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/softspark/ai-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/softspark/ai-toolkit/refactor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/softspark/ai-toolkit/refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/softspark/ai-toolkit/refactor.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00029 | $0.01439 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00720 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00288 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00144 |
Grade A, and why
refactor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 167 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Refactor Code
$ARGUMENTS
Plan and execute code refactoring.
Usage
/refactor [target] [--pattern=<pattern>]
What This Command Does
- Analyzes target code
- Identifies refactoring opportunities
- Plans refactoring steps
- Executes with user approval
Refactoring Patterns
| Pattern | Description |
|---|---|
extract-function |
Extract code block to function |
extract-component |
Extract UI component |
rename |
Rename symbol across codebase |
move |
Move code to better location |
inline |
Inline unnecessary abstraction |
simplify |
Simplify complex logic |
Safety Rules
- Run tests before refactoring
- Make atomic commits
- Preserve behavior (no feature changes)
- Run tests after each step
- Don't mix refactoring with features
Output Format
## Refactoring Plan: [Target]
### Current State
- **Location**: [file:line]
- **Issues**: [what's wrong]
### Proposed Changes
1. [Change 1]
2. [Change 2]
### Impact Analysis
- **Files affected**: [count]
- **Risk level**: [Low/Medium/High]
### Test Coverage
- [x] Unit tests exist
- [ ] Integration tests needed
### Rollback
git revert [commit]
Approval Required
Before executing:
- Plan reviewed
- Tests passing
- Backup created
Common Rationalizations
| Excuse | Why It's Wrong |
|---|---|
| "It works, don't touch it" | Working code that's hard to maintain slows every future change |
| "We'll refactor it later" | Later never comes — refactor when the pain is fresh and context is loaded |
| "It's too risky to change" | That's exactly why it needs refactoring — risk compounds with complexity |
| "Just one more hack won't hurt" | Each hack makes the next one easier to justify — break the cycle now |
| "We need to rewrite from scratch" | Incremental refactoring is safer and delivers value continuously |
READ BEFORE WRITE
This command analyzes and plans first. Execution requires explicit approval.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 167 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 5f8da925ca65
refactor is a skill published in the GitHub repository softspark/ai-toolkit (169 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 1,439 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
swift
Swift development: concurrency patterns, async/await, actors, testing with XCTest and Swift Testing framework.
deepeval
Use when discussing or working with DeepEval (the python AI evaluation framework).
squid-testing-python
Write and evaluate effective Python tests using pytest. Use when writing tests, reviewing test code, debugging test failures, or improving test coverage.
unit-test
Use when the user asks for unit tests (e.g, "单元测试", "unit test"), wants to add/fix Go tests, wants table-driven and subtest organization, or wants to enforce a minimum coverage gate (default 80% for logic packages). Prioritize bug discovery (especially boundary, mapping loss, and concurrency defects) over test volume.…
fuzzing-test
Generate Go fuzz tests (Go 1.18+ testing.F) for specified code when users ask for fuzzing/模糊测试/fuzz test generation, parser robustness, round-trip, or differential fuzzing. Always run an applicability gate first; if the target is not suitable, explain concrete reasons and stop without writing fuzz test code.
seed
Database seeding, test fixtures, factory patterns, fake data generation. Idempotent seed scripts.