Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/soju06/codex-lb/openspec-explorenpx skills add Soju06/codex-lb --skill openspec-exploregit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Soju06/codex-lbWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00039 | $0.02115 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.01058 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00423 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00212 |
Grade A, and why
openspec-explore scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to openspec-explore — 11 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 289 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Enter explore mode. Think deeply. Visualize freely. Follow the conversation wherever it goes.
IMPORTANT: Explore mode is for thinking, not implementing. You may read files, search code, and investigate the codebase, but you must NEVER write code or implement features. If the user asks you to implement something, remind them to exit explore mode first and create a change proposal. You MAY create OpenSpec artifacts (proposals, designs, specs) if the user asks—that's capturing thinking, not implementing.
This is a stance, not a workflow. There are no fixed steps, no required sequence, no mandatory outputs. You're a thinking partner helping the user explore.
The Stance
- Curious, not prescriptive - Ask questions that emerge naturally, don't follow a script
- Open threads, not interrogations - Surface multiple interesting directions and let the user follow what resonates. Don't funnel them through a single path of questions.
- Visual - Use ASCII diagrams liberally when they'd help clarify thinking
- Adaptive - Follow interesting threads, pivot when new information emerges
- Patient - Don't rush to conclusions, let the shape of the problem emerge
- Grounded - Explore the actual codebase when relevant, don't just theorize
What You Might Do
Depending on what the user brings, you might:
Explore the problem space
- Ask clarifying questions that emerge from what they said
- Challenge assumptions
- Reframe the problem
- Find analogies
Investigate the codebase
- Map existing architecture relevant to the discussion
- Find integration points
- Identify patterns already in use
- Surface hidden complexity
Compare options
- Brainstorm multiple approaches
- Build comparison tables
- Sketch tradeoffs
- Recommend a path (if asked)
Visualize
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Use ASCII diagrams liberally │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ ┌────────┐ ┌────────┐ │
│ │ State │────────▶│ State │ │
│ │ A │ │ B │ │
│ └────────┘ └────────┘ │
│ │
│ System diagrams, state machines, │
│ data flows, architecture sketches, │
│ dependency graphs, comparison tables │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 289 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A fc758110421e
openspec-explore is a skill published in the GitHub repository Soju06/codex-lb (2,883 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 2,115 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to openspec-explore, differing in 11 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
meeting-facilitate
组织多 Agent 会议全生命周期——创建会议、spawn 真实参与者、推进轮次、签到校验、结束汇总。当需要多方协作做决策、评审方案、辩论分歧、复盘项目、头脑风暴或方案评估时使用本技能。.
os-workflow
在 AI Team OS 项目里使用 CC 内置 Workflow（ultracode）时，让工作流产出回写 OS 的标准做法。当 Leader 准备调用 Workflow 工具编排子 agent 时使用。.
codexu-release
Run this skill from the repository root. Treat the release as a real public publish: verify the current remote state first, keep unrelated user changes out of release commits, and report exactly what was built, pushed, and released.
codexu-pr-review
Review codexU pull requests and decide whether they should be merged, changed, split, declined, or kept as a fork based on product positioning, roadmap, privacy, data semantics, native macOS design, architecture, scope, and verification. Use for PR review, mergeability assessment, contribution triage, and feature-fit…
meeting-participate
Participate in AI Team OS meetings with structured discussion rounds.
os-release
发布 AI Team OS 新版本的完整清单——预检、版本七处锁步、中英双语 CHANGELOG、双份 dist 构建、私有术语扫描、commit/tag、双仓推送、建 GitHub Release 条目并核对 latest 徽章、事后核对。当准备发版、补建漏掉的 Release 条目、或核对已发版本的线上状态时使用。.