Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/solana-foundation/solana-developer-platform/integrate-webhooknpx skills add solana-foundation/solana-developer-platform --skill integrate-webhookgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/solana-foundation/solana-developer-platformWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/solana-foundation/solana-developer-platform/integrate-webhook)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/solana-foundation/solana-developer-platform/integrate-webhook"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/solana-foundation/solana-developer-platform/integrate-webhook.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00039 | $0.01649 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00825 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00330 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00165 |
Grade A, and why
integrate-webhook scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 84 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Integrate webhook
Webhooks drive a transfer's lifecycle after the quote: awaiting_payment → settling → completed | failed | expired. Implement one WebhookProcessor in apps/sdp-api/src/routes/webhooks/ramps/<id>.ts using the interface in processor.ts:
verify(context)— verify the signature, return the parsed payload.parse(payload)— pure wire-format →RampSettlementEventmapping.process(c, environment, event)— DB orchestration; callsapplyRampSettlementEvent.
Canonical examples: the registered processors in apps/sdp-api/src/routes/webhooks/ramps/ — read the closest one before writing yours.
Mount + flow
Webhooks are not under /v1. They land at POST /webhooks/payments/ramps/{sandbox|production}/:provider. parseRampWebhookProvider accepts an id only after registration in apps/sdp-api/src/routes/webhooks/handlers.ts. The handler reads the raw body → verifies → parses → returns 2xx → runs process through c.executionCtx.waitUntil.
verify
verify(context: RampWebhookValidationContext): Promise<Payload>. context = { env, environment, headers, rawBody, requestUrl? }. Read the mode-keyed verification secret/key from env, verify the signature over the raw body, then JSON.parse and return the payload. Throw UNAUTHORIZED on a missing/invalid signature; throw badRequest on non-JSON. Use apps/sdp-api/src/lib/webhook-signature.ts and supply the upstream timestamp as timestampSeconds; the helper enforces replay tolerance as well as signature verification.
The shared verifier currently supports HMAC-SHA256 and ECDSA P-256/SHA-256, and it requires a provider-signed timestamp. If the upstream uses another algorithm or does not sign a timestamp, stop and extend/review the shared verification contract; do not fabricate a local timestamp or bypass replay protection.
This is one of the few places unknown is allowed — it's a genuine trust boundary, narrowed immediately by parse.
Signature variety across the six registered webhook providers:
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed 2b2c1b22996c
- 4d ago First seen · 84 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 5219fa20f7ba
integrate-webhook is a skill published in the GitHub repository solana-foundation/solana-developer-platform (49 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 1,649 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
convex-add
Add a capability to the CURRENT Convex app — consults the served Convex capability catalog for always-current procedures (billing, crons, auth, agent, search, …); falls back to built-in hosting or @convex-dev component search. TRIGGER when the user runs /add, or asks to add hosting/publishing or any backend capability…
twitter-reader
Read Twitter/X for financial research using opencli (read-only). Use this skill whenever the user wants to read their Twitter feed, search for financial tweets, view bookmarks, look up user profiles, or gather market sentiment from Twitter/X. Triggers include: "check my feed", "search Twitter for", "show my…
chenhao-limit-up
Use when evaluating A-share limit-up (涨停板) setups through Chen Hao's sentiment and momentum lens: market emotion cycles, board strength, follow-through, and short-term aggressive momentum trading.
trading-risk-gate
Unified pre-trade safety gate: Ruin check (Law #1), ergodicity audit, and win-rate dominance validation. Absorbs: ergodicity-check, law-of-ruin, win-rate-dominance.
cwv-optimizer
Diagnose and fix Core Web Vitals issues on AEM Edge Delivery Services pages. Goes deeper than generic CWV advice by understanding EDS-specific performance patterns including the 100KB LCP budget, E-L-D loading phases, block rendering behavior, and third-party script impact. Produces specific fixes for LCP, CLS, and…
multi-expert-analyzer
针对通用问题进行多领域专家联合分析, 综合稿产生前必经 fact-checker 与 red-team 两道独立校验。适用场景: 用户提出跨领域或不确定领域的复杂问题, 需要从多个专家角度分别搜证并相互校验后综合成文, 例如该不该买房、该不该跳槽、是否进入某个赛道等。触发关键词: 多角度分析、专家分析、综合分析、多视角、跨领域分析、从不同角度看、深度分析。问题只属于单一明确领域时, 优先使用该领域的专门 skill, 例如纯财务用 finance-core-analysis、纯技术用 software-architect。输出 (全部 markdown 保存到当前项目 markdown/ 目录): (1) 每位专家的中间分析稿…