Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sonature-lab/timsquad --skill tsq-bddgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sonature-lab/timsquadWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sonature-lab/timsquad/tsq-bdd)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sonature-lab/timsquad/tsq-bdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sonature-lab/timsquad/tsq-bdd/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sonature-lab/timsquad/tsq-bdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sonature-lab/timsquad/tsq-bdd.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.00577 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00289 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00115 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00058 |
Grade A, and why
tsq-bdd scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
BDD (Behavior-Driven Development)
철학
- 비즈니스 언어로 요구사항 표현
- Given-When-Then으로 시나리오 명세
- 살아있는 문서 (Living Documentation)
- 개발자, QA, 기획자 간 공통 언어
핵심 개념
User Story
As a [역할]
I want [기능]
So that [가치/이유]
Scenario (Given-When-Then)
Given [사전 조건]
When [행위]
Then [기대 결과]
Acceptance Criteria
인수 조건 — 기능 완료 기준
BDD vs TDD
| 관점 | TDD | BDD |
|---|---|---|
| 시점 | 개발자 (코드 단위) | 사용자/비즈니스 (행위) |
| 언어 | 기술 용어 | 비즈니스 용어 |
| 대상 | 단위 테스트 | 인수/E2E 테스트 |
| 문서 | 코드가 문서 | 시나리오가 살아있는 문서 |
권장: TDD + BDD 함께 사용 (보완 관계)
Rules
필수
- 시나리오는 비즈니스 언어로 작성
- Given-When-Then 형식 준수
- 하나의 시나리오는 하나의 행위만 테스트
- 시나리오는 독립적으로 실행 가능
금지
- 기술 용어를 시나리오에 노출 (CSS selector, API endpoint 등)
- 테스트 간 상태 공유
- UI 구현 세부사항 시나리오에 포함
Checklist
| Priority | Item |
|---|---|
| CRITICAL | Feature 파일이 비즈니스 언어로 작성됨 |
| CRITICAL | Given-When-Then 형식 준수 |
| HIGH | 시나리오가 독립적으로 실행 가능 |
| HIGH | Step Definition 재사용성 확보 |
| MEDIUM | Background로 공통 전제조건 추출 |
참조
rules/gherkin-patterns.md— Feature 파일, Step Definition, API BDD 예시, 디렉토리 구조
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 75 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 34778194a7fb
tsq-bdd is a skill published in the GitHub repository sonature-lab/timsquad (11 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 577 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
red-green-refactor
Guides the red-green-refactor TDD workflow: write a failing test first, implement the minimum code to make it pass, then refactor while keeping tests green. Use when a user asks to practice TDD, write tests first, follow red-green-refactor, do test-driven development, write failing tests before code, or phrases like…
superpowers-zh
Use when constraining AI coding with Chinese TDD methodology, systematic debugging, code review, and verification workflows. Superpowers-zh: Chinese adaptation of the Superpowers AI-assisted programming skills and methodologies.
testing-expert
Expert-level software testing with unit tests, integration tests, E2E tests, TDD/BDD, and testing best practices. Use when the user mentions TDD, BDD, unit tests, integration tests, or end-to-end tests, or when the task involves Testing Fundamentals, Unit Testing, Integration Testing, or End-to-End Testing.
simple-tdd
Test-driven development methodology — write the failing test first, then the minimum code to pass it.
Learn what defines effective BDD scenarios
Interactive guidance on writing complete, effective BDD scenarios for story-flow.
bdd-mathematical-verification
BDD-Driven Mathematical Content Verification Skill Combines Behavior-Driven Development with mathematical formula extraction, verification, and transformation using: Cucumber/Gherkin for specification RSpec for implementation verification mathpix-gem for LaTeX/mathematical content extraction Pattern matching on syntax…