Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sonature-lab/timsquad --skill tsq-tddgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sonature-lab/timsquadWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sonature-lab/timsquad/tsq-tdd)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sonature-lab/timsquad/tsq-tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sonature-lab/timsquad/tsq-tdd/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sonature-lab/timsquad/tsq-tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sonature-lab/timsquad/tsq-tdd.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00083 | $0.00763 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00042 | $0.00381 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00153 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
tsq-tdd scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
TDD (Test-Driven Development)
철학
- 테스트가 설계를 이끈다
- 작은 단계로 진행한다
- 리팩토링은 테스트가 보장한다
- 불확실할 때는 더 작은 단계로
Red-Green-Refactor Cycle
1. Red (1-2min) — 실패하는 테스트 작성
- 테스트가 실패하는 것을 확인
- 한 번에 하나의 기능만 테스트
- 테스트 이름으로 의도 명확히 표현
- 금지: 구현 코드 먼저 작성
2. Green (3-5min) — 테스트를 통과하는 최소 코드
- 테스트 통과만을 목표
- 가장 단순한 구현 선택
- 금지: 미래 요구사항 미리 구현, 완벽한 코드 추구
3. Refactor (5-10min) — 코드 정리
- 중복 제거, 네이밍 개선, 구조 개선
- 테스트 실행하며 진행
- 금지: 기능 변경
Kent Beck Techniques (상세: rules/techniques.md)
| 기법 | 사용 시점 |
|---|---|
| Fake It | 구현 불확실 → 하드코딩 후 일반화 |
| Triangulation | 일반화 방향 불명확 → 2+ 테스트 |
| Obvious Implementation | 구현 명확 → 바로 작성 |
| One to Many | 컬렉션 → 단일 먼저, 확장 |
| Assert First | 구조 불명확 → assertion부터 역방향 |
| Starter Test | 시작점 모름 → 가장 단순한 테스트 |
| Test Data Builder | 객체 생성 반복 → 빌더 패턴 |
| Learning Test | 새 라이브러리 → 학습 테스트 |
SSOT 통합 워크플로우
service-spec.md에서 API 명세 확인- 명세 기반 테스트 케이스 작성 (Starter Test)
- 테스트 실패 확인 (Red)
- 명세대로 구현 (Green)
- 리팩토링 (Refactor)
- 삼각측량으로 엣지 케이스 추가
Checklist
- 테스트 먼저 작성했는가
- 테스트가 실패하는 것을 확인했는가
- 최소 코드로 통과했는가
- 리팩토링 단계를 거쳤는가
- 삼각측량으로 일반화했는가
- 엣지 케이스를 테스트했는가
참조
rules/techniques.md— 각 기법의 코드 예시rules/real-world-example.md— 로그인 기능 TDD 전체 과정 + Anti-Patterns
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 76 lines · 83 tokens per session scan A 3608da6e6532
tsq-tdd is a skill published in the GitHub repository sonature-lab/timsquad (11 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 83 tokens to every session and 763 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
red-green-refactor
Guides the red-green-refactor TDD workflow: write a failing test first, implement the minimum code to make it pass, then refactor while keeping tests green. Use when a user asks to practice TDD, write tests first, follow red-green-refactor, do test-driven development, write failing tests before code, or phrases like…
superpowers-zh
Use when constraining AI coding with Chinese TDD methodology, systematic debugging, code review, and verification workflows. Superpowers-zh: Chinese adaptation of the Superpowers AI-assisted programming skills and methodologies.
simple-tdd
Test-driven development methodology — write the failing test first, then the minimum code to pass it.
implementing-tasks
Use when executing a batch of TDD-sized tasks inside a running-an-iteration call — dispatches an implementer subagent per task following red-green-refactor discipline and returns per-task completion status.
xp-practices
Apply XP practices including pair programming, ensemble programming, continuous integration, and sustainable pace. Use when implementing agile development practices, improving team collaboration, or adopting technical excellence practices.
sparc-methodology
SPARC (Specification, Pseudocode, Architecture, Refinement, Completion) comprehensive development methodology with multi-agent orchestration.