Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sonature-lab/timsquad --skill tsq-uigit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sonature-lab/timsquadWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sonature-lab/timsquad/tsq-ui)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sonature-lab/timsquad/tsq-ui"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sonature-lab/timsquad/tsq-ui/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sonature-lab/timsquad/tsq-ui"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sonature-lab/timsquad/tsq-ui.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.00566 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00283 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00113 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00057 |
Grade A, and why
tsq-ui scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
UI/UX Design Methodology
와이어프레임 표기법
+---------------------------------------------+ <- 컨테이너
| +------------------------------------------+| <- 헤더
| | [로고] [메뉴] [프로필] ||
| +------------------------------------------+|
| |
| +----------+ +----------------------------+ | <- 2컬럼
| | 사이드바 | | 메인 콘텐츠 | |
| | | | | |
| | * 메뉴1 | | +------+ +------+ | | <- 카드
| | * 메뉴2 | | |카드1 | |카드2 | | |
| | | | +------+ +------+ | |
| +----------+ +----------------------------+ |
| |
| +------------------------------------------+| <- 푸터
| | (c) 2026 Company ||
| +------------------------------------------+|
+---------------------------------------------+
표기 규칙
| 기호 | 의미 |
|---|---|
[텍스트] |
버튼/링크 |
(텍스트) |
아이콘 |
{입력} |
입력 필드 |
* 항목 |
리스트 아이템 |
[x] / [ ] |
체크박스 |
(*) / ( ) |
라디오 버튼 |
[v] |
드롭다운 |
=== |
구분선 |
... |
로딩/생략 |
사용자 플로우 표기
[시작] -> (조건) -> [액션] -> [결과]
|
[대안 경로]
예시:
[로그인 페이지] -> (회원?) -> [대시보드]
| No
[회원가입]
설계 프로세스
- SSOT(ui-ux-spec.md) 확인
- 사용자 플로우 다이어그램 작성
- 와이어프레임 작성 (ASCII)
- 컴포넌트 목록 + 인터랙션 정의
- 반응형 처리 명시
- 접근성 검토 (knowledge/checklists/accessibility.md 참조)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 71 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A 2ff15eda4897
tsq-ui is a skill published in the GitHub repository sonature-lab/timsquad (11 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 566 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
anti-ui-slop
Stop coding agents from shipping generic UI. Extend the product's design system, use UIZZE evidence only when useful, cover required states, and inspect the rendered result.
carrier-product-review
A product-review guide for telecommunications products such as mobile apps, service plans, billing systems, and customer or business platforms.
frontend-design
Design and implement context-fit frontend interfaces with deliberate art direction, accessible interaction, responsive behavior, complete states, and rendered verification. Use when creating or substantially reworking pages, components, product workspaces, dashboards, marketing sites, editorial surfaces, commerce…
web-design
UI review against Web Interface Guidelines. Use when asked to review UI, check accessibility, or audit design.
design-system
Document and define UI design system tokens, components, and guidelines.
web-design-guidelines
Review UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", or "vs best practices".