Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sonichi/sutando --skill status-ackgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sonichi/sutandoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sonichi/sutando/status-ack)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sonichi/sutando/status-ack"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sonichi/sutando/status-ack/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sonichi/sutando/status-ack"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sonichi/sutando/status-ack.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00076 | $0.01556 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00622 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00311 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00156 |
Grade A, and why
status-ack scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 98 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
status-ack
The core cannot say "received" while it is deep in a long turn or while its session watcher is
gone. This runner works outside the core's turn. On each pass it decides, per queued task,
whether the requester is owed one status line. The decision comes from src/status_ack_policy.py
and is made from observed facts only.
Scope
It speaks only for a task no session has picked up (no RUNNING phase, no worker holding it)
that shows no activity card (no row projected or owed in state/activity/<task>.json) and
no sent progress notice (task-progress records progress:<task>:sent after a send; its first-notify marker is bookkeeping only). The predicate is
src/ack_overlap.py. The gateway asks it again just before it sends the ack, for that ack's own
outbox item only, so a pickup after publication withdraws the line and nothing else. Anything else is
the card's and the progress notifier's to report, so this runner stays silent. A task a session
claimed and then went quiet on is out of scope here. The second thing it does is the owner DM
when the watcher is down.
What it says, and where
- One initial line per task, at most. It is sent only after the task's first-ack deadline, which is measured from intake and set per priority. The text is one of the policy's fixed templates. There is no estimate and no invented progress.
- Only in the task's own conversation. The room and thread come from the bridge-attested
task envelope (
envelope_hmacmust verify). If the envelope does not verify, the source is not Matrix, or the room or thread cannot be verified, nothing is sent. There is no fallback room and no DM. The line goes out asresults/proactive-about-<task>--<ts>.to-ag2space.txt. The gateway's proactive outbox lane threads it on the task's message and checks the task again just before the send. This skill does not post, retry or claim delivery itself. - The core's own "on it" and this line never both go out. Both take
ack:<task>:initialinsrc/ack_claim.py, and whichever claims it first is the only one that speaks. The core's firstnotify.py --task-filecall for a task is its initial ack. Its later calls are progress and are never suppressed, and neither is the task's real answer. - Checked again before publish. Between deciding and publishing, the runner re-reads the result, the activity phase and any pending cancel. If any of them has changed, it releases its claim and publishes nothing.
- Counted as sent only with a receipt. An ack is
confirmedonly once the outbox item is DELIVERED with an event id. A send withdrawn at dispatch releases the claim. Any other park leaves the claimunknown, and that ack is never retried. - Watcher down. When only a standby watcher has held the inbox for
STATUS_ACK_WATCHER_DOWN_AFTER_Sseconds, the owner gets one DM through the proactive path saying so and naming the remedy (restart the core). This happens once per outage. The outage ends when a session watcher holds the inbox again. Room lines say "the owner has been told" only after that DM has a delivery receipt.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 98 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A 00f83d632206
status-ack is a skill published in the GitHub repository sonichi/sutando (400 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 1,556 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-26.
Other skills, from other repositories
linear-app-setup
Create and configure a Linear agent app so the assistant can manage issues, projects, and workflows under its own identity.
projects
YOU OWN THIS. Manage the user's projects — shared instructions and file lists that fresh conversations start from — and see each project's conversations. Reach for it by INTENT whenever a need or issue touches a project, its instructions, or its files — even when the user never says "project".
taskwing-plan
Use when you need to clarify a goal and build an approved execution plan.
taskwing-next
Use when you are ready to start the next approved TaskWing task with full context.
taskwing-done
Use when implementation is verified and you are ready to complete the current task.
gmail
Manage Gmail email — drafting, sending, organizing, filters, vacation replies, and inbox analysis.