Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sordi-ai/skill-everything --skill code-qualitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sordi-ai/skill-everythingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sordi-ai/skill-everything/code-quality)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sordi-ai/skill-everything/code-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sordi-ai/skill-everything/code-quality/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sordi-ai/skill-everything/code-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sordi-ai/skill-everything/code-quality.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.01493 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00597 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00299 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00149 |
Grade A, and why
code-quality scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
17. **SHOULD: External dependencies only in dedicated adapter files.** No direct `axios.get()` in business logic — always wrap through an interface. How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 89 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Sub-Skill: Code Quality & Common Mistakes
Purpose: Prevents the 20 % of mistakes that cause 80 % of review comments. Concrete rules from real projects — no boilerplate.
Rule classification
- MUST — load-bearing. Violating causes bugs, security issues, or cross-team confusion. Never break.
- SHOULD — default behavior. Deviation needs a documented reason in the code or PR.
- AVOID — usually wrong; documented exception inline where needed.
Where these rules don't strictly apply: test fixtures, generated code (parser tables, codegen output, schema-derived types), CLI bootstrap scripts, framework adapters, and migration scripts may legitimately differ. The rules below apply to production code paths unless an inline exception says otherwise.
Rules
Functions & Logic
- SHOULD: Functions under ~30 lines. Longer → split where practical. Reduces cognitive load.
- AVOID: Boolean as last argument.
render(true)is unreadable. Use enum or named-property:render({ withHeader: true }). - SHOULD: Early return over nested if-blocks. Nesting depth > 2 is a warning sign.
- SHOULD: No magic numbers.
if (status === 3)→if (status === OrderStatus.SHIPPED). - AVOID: Double negation.
if (!isNotValid)→if (isValid).
Variables & Naming
- SHOULD: Variable names describe content, not type.
userListinstead ofarr,activeUserIdinstead ofid. - SHOULD: Temporary variables for complex expressions.
const isEligible = age >= 18 && !isBanned;instead of cramming it all into anif. - AVOID: Abbreviations except established ones (
id,url,ctx,req,res).usr,cfg,tmp→ spell out.
Error Handling
- MUST: Every
asynccall needstry/catchor.catch(). Unhandled promise rejections crash Node processes. - MUST: Never silently swallow error objects.
catch (e) {}is forbidden. At minimum:logger.warn(e). - MUST: Error messages must include context.
throw new Error('User not found: ' + userId)notthrow new Error('Not found'). - SHOULD: Catch specific exception types, not broad categories. Catch
ConnectionErrornotException. Broad catches mask unrelated bugs and make debugging harder. - SHOULD: Use exponential backoff with jitter for retry logic. Never retry in a tight loop. Each retry should wait longer than the last with randomization to prevent thundering herds.
- MUST: Never retry non-idempotent operations without explicit safeguards. A retried POST that creates a resource can produce duplicates. Use idempotency keys or check-before-retry patterns.
- SHOULD: Propagate errors with context rather than swallowing and re-raising generic exceptions. Use
raise NewError("context") from original_errorto preserve the chain. Reference: ERR-2026-016.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 89 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 24407e81b58c
code-quality is a skill published in the GitHub repository sordi-ai/skill-everything (20 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 1,493 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
remove-ai-slops
Removes AI-generated code smells from branch changes or an explicit file list behind regression tests. Use when the user asks to clean up, deslop, or remove AI-slop patterns from recent changes.
review-work
Post-implementation gate review: run manual QA on the real surface yourself, then launch ONE gate reviewer (never a panel) to audit goal, constraints, code quality, security, missed context, and QA evidence. Use before a PR handoff or when the user explicitly asks to review completed work.
tech-debt-audit
Thorough, file-cited technical debt audit across 9 dimensions using AST-grep (tree-sitter), grep, LSP, and language-native tooling. Produces TECHDEBTAUDIT.md with severity, effort estimates, and prioritized fixes. Use when asked for codebase health check, tech debt audit, architecture review, code quality assessment…
code-review-web
Review web application code for bugs, security issues, performance problems, and stack-specific anti-patterns. Use this skill whenever the user wants to review code, debug a production issue, investigate a build failure, audit security, or check a PR before merging. Triggers on code review, review my code, debug…
design-standards
Apply production-grade design standards when building or reviewing pages, components, or UI. Use this skill whenever the user asks to build a page, design a component, lay out a section, review the UI, fix the layout, or check design quality. Triggers on build a page, create a component, design a section, hero, card…
git-pr-reviewer
Review pull requests for code quality, security issues, and best practices. Use when reviewing PRs, checking code changes, or analyzing diffs before merge.