Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to sorryorc/mcp-codex-worker. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sorryorc/mcp-codex-worker/main/.claude/skills/worker-campaign-cheap-reliability/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sorryorc/mcp-codex-workerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sorryorc/mcp-codex-worker/worker-campaign-cheap-reliability)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sorryorc/mcp-codex-worker/worker-campaign-cheap-reliability"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sorryorc/mcp-codex-worker/worker-campaign-cheap-reliability.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00300 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00150 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00060 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
worker-campaign-cheap-reliability scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Worker Campaign Cheap Reliability
Goal
Turn "cheap worker feels degraded" into measured failure classes and gated mitigations.
Phases
- Baseline: run
npm test,npm run codex:audit -- --since-minutes=60, and collect recent failed episodes. - Instrument: ensure reliability profile, episode summary, receipt abnormal verdict, and tool metrics exist.
- Gate: use
strictfor normal risky edits andcriticalfor security, release, migration, or broad refactors. - Review: send semantic-risk cases to main-thread or strong-model review.
- Promote: only make a warning into a hard block after eval cases prove low false-positive risk.
Wrong Paths To Fence Off
- Do not rely on more output tokens as thinking time.
- Do not expose all tools to a weak model by default.
- Do not trust a model-created Observation without runtime receipt.
When Not To Use
Do not use this for one isolated failed command. Use worker-debugging-playbook.
Verification
npm testnpm run codex:guard- Compare trajectory scores before and after a change.
Provenance and maintenance
Add real user feedback cases as eval episodes before tightening blocking gates.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 39 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 733d5ef627c0
worker-campaign-cheap-reliability is a skill published in the GitHub repository sorryorc/mcp-codex-worker (2 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 300 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
memstack-deployment-domain-ssl
Use this skill when the user says 'setup domain', 'configure DNS', 'SSL certificate', 'domain-ssl', 'custom domain', 'HTTPS setup', or needs to configure DNS records, SSL certificates, and custom domains for any hosting provider. Do NOT use for full deployment workflows.
memstack-development-refactor-planner
Use this skill when the user says 'refactor', 'refactoring plan', 'code cleanup', 'reduce duplication', 'simplify code', 'tech debt', 'god class', 'tight coupling', or needs to systematically improve existing code. Identifies targets, assesses risk, and builds incremental execution plans. Do NOT use for writing new…
memstack-automation-webhook-designer
Use this skill when the user says 'webhook', 'webhook handler', 'webhook endpoint', 'receive events', 'HMAC verification', 'idempotency', or needs secure webhook handlers with signature verification, retry handling, and dead letter queues. Do NOT use for full n8n workflows or scheduled tasks.
memstack-product-feedback-analyzer
Use this skill when the user says 'analyze feedback', 'feedback analysis', 'what are customers asking for', or has support tickets, reviews, or survey data to categorize, score, and prioritize into actionable reports. Do NOT use for competitor analysis or market research.