technical-roadmap-planning

technical-roadmap-planning is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from soulcodex/agentic. It costs 59 tokens per session (1,001 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A planning guide for a technical roadmap: a time-ordered plan for engineering work. It gathers goals, technical debt, reliability data, team capacity, dependencies, impact, and effort before sequencing initiatives.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to plan quarterly or half-year engineering work, prioritise initiatives, compare impact with effort, and record success measures.
Why use it?
It helps teams choose and order engineering projects using business priorities, available capacity, risks, and dependencies instead of guesswork.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions Codex; mentions OpenCode.

Good fit Use it to plan quarterly or half-year engineering work, prioritise initiatives, compare impact with effort, and record success measures.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/soulcodex/agentic/technical-roadmap-planning
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add soulcodex/agentic --skill technical-roadmap-planning
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/soulcodex/agentic

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for technical-roadmap-planning

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/soulcodex/agentic/technical-roadmap-planning/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/soulcodex/agentic/technical-roadmap-planning)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/soulcodex/agentic/technical-roadmap-planning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/soulcodex/agentic/technical-roadmap-planning/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for technical-roadmap-planning

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/soulcodex/agentic/technical-roadmap-planning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/soulcodex/agentic/technical-roadmap-planning.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 59 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,001 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00059 $0.01001
Opus 5.5 $0.00024 $0.00400
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00012 $0.00200
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00100

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 9e66b6633566, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

technical-roadmap-planning scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/backend/technical-roadmap-planning/SKILL.md · 125 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 125 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Technical Roadmap Planning Skill

Step 1 — Gather Inputs

Before defining initiatives, collect:

  • Business objectives for the period (OKRs, product strategy, growth targets).
  • Tech debt inventory — known architectural problems, reliability gaps, security risks.
  • Reliability data — incident history, SLA breaches, on-call burden.
  • Team capacity — headcount, planned leave, hiring timeline.
  • Dependencies — migrations, third-party deprecations, compliance deadlines.

Ask the user to provide or confirm these inputs before proceeding.

Step 2 — Define Initiatives

For each initiative, capture:

Initiative: <name>
Problem:    <what is broken or missing — one sentence>
Metric:     <how success is measured — must be quantifiable>
Effort:     <S | M | L | XL>  (S=days, M=weeks, L=1-2 months, XL=quarter+)
Impact:     <Low | Medium | High | Critical>
Dependencies: <other initiatives or teams this blocks or is blocked by>

Example:

Initiative: Database connection pooling
Problem:    Under peak load, the API exhausts the DB connection limit, causing 503s.
Metric:     Zero connection-limit errors in staging load test at 2× current peak traffic.
Effort:     S
Impact:     High
Dependencies: None

Step 3 — Prioritise (Impact / Effort Matrix)

Plot each initiative on a 2×2 grid and apply the priority rules:

Impact
  High │ Quick Wins ★ │ Strategic Bets ◆
       │ (do now)     │ (plan carefully)
       ├──────────────┼──────────────────
  Low  │ Fill-ins     │ Avoid / defer
       │ (if capacity)│
       └──────────────┴────────────────
          Low Effort      High Effort
Priority Quadrant Action
1 High Impact + Low Effort Schedule immediately
2 High Impact + High Effort Plan with milestones
3 Low Impact + Low Effort Fill between larger items
4 Low Impact + High Effort Defer or remove

Mark compliance/security items as non-negotiable regardless of quadrant.

Read the full file on GitHub · 125 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 125 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 9e66b6633566

Subscribe to this mod's changes

technical-roadmap-planning is a skill published in the GitHub repository soulcodex/agentic (10 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 1,001 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

create-issue

Draft and submit a GitHub issue from a user idea or bug description, with bilingual body and correct labels.

QwenLM/qwen-code · 26 tokens

html-ppt-knowledge-arch-blueprint

OpenDesign's incident retro: the daemon-restart data bug, the root cause, the fix, and the systemic follow-ups. Built as a decision-grade product management deck for engineering, SRE, leadership.

nexu-io/open-design · 52 tokens

issue-creator

A guide for turning unclear user feedback from text, chat excerpts, or screenshots into a focused GitHub issue, a tracked software-work item. It preserves the original request and separates evidence from information that is still unknown.

termio-sh/termio · 96 tokens

status

Surfaces the current state of work in gflow-cli. Three variants at different levels of detail: full state (status), next task only (next), active plan identity (active). All variants run scripts/dev/activeplan.py and filter its output to the requested detail level.

ffroliva/gflow-cli · 58 tokens

write-workflows

Author Mendix workflows in MDL — user tasks, decisions, parallel splits, jumps, waits and boundary events, with CREATE, ALTER and DROP. Use when building a business process with human steps, timers or parallel branches.

mendixlabs/mxcli · 49 tokens

write-microflows

Microflow syntax reference in MDL — every activity type, control flow, expressions, and the mistakes that fail mxcli check. Use before writing any CREATE MICROFLOW, and when debugging a microflow syntax error.

mendixlabs/mxcli · 49 tokens