webhook-development

A guide for building webhook systems. Webhooks are HTTP messages that let one service notify another when an event happens.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to receive or send webhooks with HMAC signature checks, immediate acknowledgement, queued processing, idempotency, retries with backoff, and dead-letter handling.
Why use it?
It addresses common delivery and security problems, including forged requests, duplicate events, temporary failures, and events that cannot be processed.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/soulcodex/agentic/webhook-development
Any agent
npx skills add soulcodex/agentic --skill webhook-development
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/soulcodex/agentic

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 56 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,053 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00056 $0.01053
Opus 5 $0.00028 $0.00526
Sonnet 5 $0.00011 $0.00211
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00105

Measured yesterday against content hash 403636ceda45, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

webhook-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/backend/webhook-development/SKILL.md · 126 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 126 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Webhook Development Skill

Step 1 — Receiving Webhooks

Verify the signature first — before any processing:

// HMAC-SHA256 verification (Go)
func verifySignature(body []byte, signatureHeader, secret string) bool {
    mac := hmac.New(sha256.New, []byte(secret))
    mac.Write(body)
    expected := "sha256=" + hex.EncodeToString(mac.Sum(nil))
    return hmac.Equal([]byte(expected), []byte(signatureHeader))
}
// HMAC-SHA256 verification (TypeScript)
async function verifySignature(body: string, signature: string, secret: string): Promise<boolean> {
  const key = await crypto.subtle.importKey('raw', new TextEncoder().encode(secret),
    { name: 'HMAC', hash: 'SHA-256' }, false, ['sign'])
  const mac = await crypto.subtle.sign('HMAC', key, new TextEncoder().encode(body))
  const expected = 'sha256=' + Array.from(new Uint8Array(mac)).map(b => b.toString(16).padStart(2, '0')).join('')
  return expected === signature
}

Respond immediately — enqueue for async processing:

POST /webhooks/stripe
  1. Read raw body (before any parsing)
  2. Verify HMAC-SHA256 signature → 401 if invalid
  3. Return HTTP 200 immediately
  4. Enqueue event → message queue (SQS, RabbitMQ, etc.)

Never do database writes or downstream API calls inside the HTTP handler — the sender's retry logic will time out.

Step 2 — Processing Webhooks (Idempotent Consumer)

Worker loop:
  1. Dequeue event
  2. Check idempotency key (event_id) in processed_events table
     → if found: ack and skip
  3. Begin transaction
     4. Process business logic
     5. Insert event_id into processed_events
  6. Commit
  7. Ack message

Idempotency key: use the sender's event ID (e.g., Stripe's evt_xxx, GitHub's X-GitHub-Delivery header). If the sender does not provide one, derive it from a hash of the payload.

Retry with exponential backoff:

Attempt 1: immediate
Attempt 2: +1 second
Attempt 3: +5 seconds
Attempt 4: +30 seconds
Attempt 5: → dead-letter queue

Read the full file on GitHub · 126 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 126 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 403636ceda45

Subscribe to this mod's changes

webhook-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository soulcodex/agentic (10 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 1,053 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

Webhook Subscriptions

Guides webhook-driven integrations, event receivers, and trigger flows without inventing runtime support the current repo does not actually have.

agentic-in/elephant-agent · 29 tokens

research-repository

Build a repository that makes findings findable, reusable, and cumulative across teams. Use when the same research keeps getting redone. For synthesising one study, use affinity-diagram.

Owl-Listener/designer-skills · 43 tokens

survey-design

Design unbiased survey instruments — question wording, scales, and sampling — to measure attitudes at scale. Use when you need quantitative breadth. For behavioural experiments, use a-b-test-design (prototyping-testing).

Owl-Listener/designer-skills · 47 tokens

localization-design

Design for multiple languages, writing directions, and cultural contexts — text expansion, RTL mirroring, and locale formats. Use when shipping beyond one locale. For the words themselves, use ux-writing (designer-toolkit).

Owl-Listener/designer-skills · 49 tokens

design-negotiation

Advocate for design quality, scope, and timeline with partners and leadership using evidence and shared goals. Use in the conversation itself. For the commercial vocabulary behind it, use business-design (ux-strategy).

Owl-Listener/designer-skills · 48 tokens

design-debt-audit

Inventory and prioritise accumulated design inconsistencies across a product. Use when drift has built up over time. For token coverage specifically use design-token-audit (designer-toolkit); for WCAG gaps use accessibility-audit (design-systems).

Owl-Listener/designer-skills · 59 tokens