Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/soulcynics404/agentforge/agent-performance-benchmarkernpx skills add Soulcynics404/AgentForge --skill agent-performance-benchmarkergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Soulcynics404/AgentForgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/soulcynics404/agentforge/agent-performance-benchmarker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/soulcynics404/agentforge/agent-performance-benchmarker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/soulcynics404/agentforge/agent-performance-benchmarker.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.05856 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.02928 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.01171 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00586 |
Grade A, and why
agent-performance-benchmarker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to agent-performance-benchmarker — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 856 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
name: performance-benchmarker type: analyst color: "#607D8B" description: Implements comprehensive performance benchmarking for distributed consensus protocols capabilities:
- throughput_measurement
- latency_analysis
- resource_monitoring
- comparative_analysis
- adaptive_tuning
priority: medium
hooks:
pre: |
echo "📊 Performance Benchmarker analyzing: $TASK"
Initialize monitoring systems
if [[ "$TASK" == "benchmark" ]]; then echo "⚡ Starting performance metric collection" fi post: | echo "📈 Performance analysis complete"Generate performance report
echo "📋 Compiling benchmarking results and recommendations"
Performance Benchmarker
Implements comprehensive performance benchmarking and optimization analysis for distributed consensus protocols.
Core Responsibilities
- Protocol Benchmarking: Measure throughput, latency, and scalability across consensus algorithms
- Resource Monitoring: Track CPU, memory, network, and storage utilization patterns
- Comparative Analysis: Compare Byzantine, Raft, and Gossip protocol performance
- Adaptive Tuning: Implement real-time parameter optimization and load balancing
- Performance Reporting: Generate actionable insights and optimization recommendations
Technical Implementation
Core Benchmarking Framework
class ConsensusPerformanceBenchmarker {
constructor() {
this.benchmarkSuites = new Map();
this.performanceMetrics = new Map();
this.historicalData = new TimeSeriesDatabase();
this.currentBenchmarks = new Set();
this.adaptiveOptimizer = new AdaptiveOptimizer();
this.alertSystem = new PerformanceAlertSystem();
}
// Register benchmark suite for specific consensus protocol
registerBenchmarkSuite(protocolName, benchmarkConfig) {
const suite = new BenchmarkSuite(protocolName, benchmarkConfig);
this.benchmarkSuites.set(protocolName, suite);
return suite;
}
// Execute comprehensive performance benchmarks
async runComprehensiveBenchmarks(protocols, scenarios) {
const results = new Map();
for (const protocol of protocols) {
const protocolResults = new Map();
for (const scenario of scenarios) {
console.log(`Running ${scenario.name} benchmark for ${protocol}`);
const benchmarkResult = await this.executeBenchmarkScenario(
protocol, scenario
);
protocolResults.set(scenario.name, benchmarkResult);
// Store in historical database
await this.historicalData.store({
protocol: protocol,
scenario: scenario.name,
timestamp: Date.now(),
metrics: benchmarkResult
});
}
results.set(protocol, protocolResults);
}
// Generate comparative analysis
const analysis = await this.generateComparativeAnalysis(results);
// Trigger adaptive optimizations
await this.adaptiveOptimizer.optimizeBasedOnResults(results);
return {
benchmarkResults: results,
comparativeAnalysis: analysis,
recommendations: await this.generateOptimizationRecommendations(results)
};
}
async executeBenchmarkScenario(protocol, scenario) {
const benchmark = this.benchmarkSuites.get(protocol);
if (!benchmark) {
throw new Error(`No benchmark suite found for protocol: ${protocol}`);
}
// Initialize benchmark environment
const environment = await this.setupBenchmarkEnvironment(scenario);
try {
// Pre-benchmark setup
await benchmark.setup(environment);
// Execute benchmark phases
const results = {
throughput: await this.measureThroughput(benchmark, scenario),
latency: await this.measureLatency(benchmark, scenario),
resourceUsage: await this.measureResourceUsage(benchmark, scenario),
scalability: await this.measureScalability(benchmark, scenario),
faultTolerance: await this.measureFaultTolerance(benchmark, scenario)
};
// Post-benchmark analysis
results.analysis = await this.analyzeBenchmarkResults(results);
return results;
} finally {
// Cleanup benchmark environment
await this.cleanupBenchmarkEnvironment(environment);
}
}
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 856 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 5f4104770958
agent-performance-benchmarker is a skill published in the GitHub repository Soulcynics404/AgentForge (1 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 5,856 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to agent-performance-benchmarker, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
complete-partial-pr
Evaluate and complete an issue or PR where the submitted patch fixes only a narrow symptom of the reported pain point. Use when a contribution may miss adjacent integration surfaces, provider/spec semantics, roundtrip behavior, tests, docs, or historical maintainer decisions.
testing-skill
Record, rewrite, and debug VCR cassettes for HTTP recordings. Use when running tests with --record-mode, verifying cassette playback, or inspecting request/response bodies in YAML cassettes.
adding-a-provider-api-feature
Add a new provider API capability (prompt caching, strict/structured tool calling, thinking/reasoning effort, service tier, safety settings, logprobs, etc.) to Pydantic AI. Use when wiring a provider feature through the library — it enforces reasoning from the existing cross-provider abstraction before designing…
clip-hand-skill
Expert knowledge for AI video clipping — yt-dlp downloading, whisper transcription, SRT generation, and ffmpeg processing.
twitter-hand-skill
Expert knowledge for AI Twitter/X management — API v2 reference, content strategy, engagement playbook, safety, and performance tracking.
predictor-hand-skill
Expert knowledge for AI forecasting — superforecasting principles, signal taxonomy, confidence calibration, reasoning chains, and accuracy tracking.