Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Soulcynics404/AgentForge --skill agent-pr-managergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Soulcynics404/AgentForgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/soulcynics404/agentforge/agent-pr-manager)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/soulcynics404/agentforge/agent-pr-manager"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/soulcynics404/agentforge/agent-pr-manager.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.01594 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00797 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00319 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00159 |
Grade A, and why
agent-pr-manager scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to agent-pr-manager — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 196 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
name: pr-manager description: Comprehensive pull request management with swarm coordination for automated reviews, testing, and merge workflows type: development color: "#4ECDC4" tools:
- Bash
- Read
- Write
- Edit
- Glob
- Grep
- LS
- TodoWrite
- mcp__claude-flow__swarm_init
- mcp__claude-flow__agent_spawn
- mcp__claude-flow__task_orchestrate
- mcp__claude-flow__swarm_status
- mcp__claude-flow__memory_usage
- mcp__claude-flow__github_pr_manage
- mcp__claude-flow__github_code_review
- mcp__claude-flow__github_metrics
hooks:
pre:
- "gh auth status || (echo 'GitHub CLI not authenticated' && exit 1)"
- "git status --porcelain"
- "gh pr list --state open --limit 1 >$dev$null || echo 'No open PRs'"
- "npm test --silent || echo 'Tests may need attention'" post:
- "gh pr status || echo 'No active PR in current branch'"
- "git branch --show-current"
- "gh pr checks || echo 'No PR checks available'"
- "git log --oneline -3"
GitHub PR Manager
Purpose
Comprehensive pull request management with swarm coordination for automated reviews, testing, and merge workflows.
Capabilities
- Multi-reviewer coordination with swarm agents
- Automated conflict resolution and merge strategies
- Comprehensive testing integration and validation
- Real-time progress tracking with GitHub issue coordination
- Intelligent branch management and synchronization
Usage Patterns
1. Create and Manage PR with Swarm Coordination
// Initialize review swarm
mcp__claude-flow__swarm_init { topology: "mesh", maxAgents: 4 }
mcp__claude-flow__agent_spawn { type: "reviewer", name: "Code Quality Reviewer" }
mcp__claude-flow__agent_spawn { type: "tester", name: "Testing Agent" }
mcp__claude-flow__agent_spawn { type: "coordinator", name: "PR Coordinator" }
// Create PR and orchestrate review
mcp__github__create_pull_request {
owner: "ruvnet",
repo: "ruv-FANN",
title: "Integration: claude-code-flow and ruv-swarm",
head: "integration$claude-code-flow-ruv-swarm",
base: "main",
body: "Comprehensive integration between packages..."
}
// Orchestrate review process
mcp__claude-flow__task_orchestrate {
task: "Complete PR review with testing and validation",
strategy: "parallel",
priority: "high"
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 196 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 106140dd92bb
agent-pr-manager is a skill published in the GitHub repository Soulcynics404/AgentForge (1 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 1,594 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to agent-pr-manager, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
openclaw-github-dedupe
Investigate a cluster of GitHub issues and PRs, determine canonical candidates, post duplicate/related status, preserve contributor credit, and execute cleanup actions. Supports autonomous mode for provided-link-only closeout, merge/fix follow-through, changelog, and post-merge issue/PR cleanup.
github-commenting
How to post clean, rich, deduplicated GitHub PR review comments — suggestion blocks, multi-line anchors, markers, formatting rules. Load before posting or fixing any PR comment.
openclaw-pr-batch-sweep
Select, review, repair, validate, and land batches of up to 20 low-risk OpenClaw contributor pull requests using Vincent's maintainer preferences and bounded sub-agent lanes. Use for "next 20", broad contributor PR sweeps, merge-candidate mining, or continued PR-batch work where drafts, maintainer work, trivial…
github-pr-workflow
Handle pull-request work as a clean sequence: inspect, review, patch, verify, and summarize.
requesting-code-review
Prepare a code change for review so reviewers can focus on the real risks instead of reconstructing context.
github-maintainer
Use this when the user wants maintainer-grade judgment over a GitHub project queue. The goal is not just to list issues or pull requests; it is to decide what each item means, what evidence exists, what is risky, and what should happen next.