Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add SpaiR/task-pipeline/plugin install taskWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/spair/task-pipeline/roadmap-to-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/spair/task-pipeline/roadmap-to-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/spair/task-pipeline/roadmap-to-workflow.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.05344 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.02672 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.01069 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00534 |
Grade A, and why
roadmap-to-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 193 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Drive an approved roadmap through a dynamic Workflow. This skill collects the roadmap's unchecked items, sorts them into dependency-ordered waves, then invokes the plugin-shipped Workflow driver (skills/_lib/roadmap-driver.js, via the Workflow tool's scriptPath) that, within each wave, plans all items in parallel and then implements, reviews, and ticks them off one item at a time in the shared working tree. It does not hand-roll that fan-out itself, and it does not author the Workflow script — the driver is a static file, inspectable at any time, parameterized only through args (Step 2). If the Workflow tool isn't available, it falls back to running items serially by hand, in the same dependency order (Step 2).
Per-item model control. Each roadmap item may carry a **Model:** hint (haiku | sonnet | opus); the driver passes it to that item's implement agent as opts.model, and scales the plan stage down for lightweight items (a haiku-hinted item is planned by sonnet at low effort; everything else by opus). The review agent ignores it — task:code-reviewer pins its own model, so a haiku item never gets a haiku review.
Per-item execution is a three-agent split by default — opus plans (sonnet for haiku-hinted items), the item's model implements and commits, task:code-reviewer reviews and commits its fixes on top; a fourth, cheap driver stage then ticks the roadmap checkbox (Step 2).
This skill is the opt-in for the Workflow tool — reading it and following the Steps is the authorization; there is no magic keyword and no separate confirmation.
Input: $ARGUMENTS — optional. A single positional <roadmap-slug> (or path) to skip the roadmap picker. No flags — item scope is chosen interactively (Step 0).
Format contract: docs/contract.md § Roadmap file format is the single source of truth for item grammar (### - [ ] N., **Dependencies:**, **Model:**); docs/contract.md § task.md format for the artifact each item's plan agent writes.
Step 0: Setup gate, pick roadmap, pick scope
roadmap-to-workflow is not an intake skill — it never runs setup itself (a roadmap can't exist without .task/CLAUDE.md, so an absent one means something upstream is broken).
echo "$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT" # note this absolute path — pass it as `pluginRoot` in Step 2's args
source "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/_lib/resolve-ws.sh" # sourcing runs find_ai_dir → sets AI_DIR
echo "$AI_DIR" # note this one too — pass it as `aiDir` in Step 2's args
[[ -f "$AI_DIR/CLAUDE.md" ]] || echo "CLAUDE.md not found"
bash "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/validate/validate.sh" all
CLAUDE.md not found(the guard above echoes it;validate.sh allalso exits 2 with the same message) → hard-stop redirect (do not bootstrap here):The project isn't set up yet. Capture something first with
/task:to-task,/task:to-plan,/task:to-roadmap, or/task:to-spec— those four set the project up inline. → Next:/task:to-roadmap- Any other non-zero exit from
validate.sh→validate.sh allchecks every artifact, so an error may sit on a task or roadmap unrelated to this run. Mind the timing: at this point the roadmap has not been picked yet (that happens in the Roadmap sub-step below), so do not try to judge here which errors are "yours". Surface every reported error now, block on none of them, and hold the roadmap ones. Once<slug>is resolved below, check the held list: if an error was reported against that file, stop then — "→ Next: fix the reported error in.task/roadmap/<slug>.md, then rerun/task:roadmap-to-workflow <slug>". Errors on any other artifact never block. (The one case where the roadmap is already known at gate time is a positional<roadmap-slug>in$ARGUMENTS; there you may apply the check immediately.) WARN lines never set a non-zero exit; they are informational only.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed a6462d1b3ecd
- 3d ago Changed d5c05f2da0d6
- 7d ago First seen · 193 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A e9fda6807eb2
roadmap-to-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository SpaiR/task-pipeline (7 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 5,344 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
batch
Dispatch a night's batch of Todo tickets — one worktree and one pull request each — and leave a morning summary. Run explicitly; never inferred.
prep
Spec a ticket before it is dispatched. Brainstorms it, decides everything it can recommend an answer for, asks a present human about the little that survives, and leaves the spec, the decisions and anything still open as one ticket comment. No worktree, no branch, no pull request, and the ticket stays where it was.
work
Dispatch a tracker ticket into an isolated worktree and drive it autonomously to an open pull request, then stop for review. Pass interactive to brainstorm the ticket with a human before planning it. Use when asked to work a ticket end-to-end.
daily-working
End-to-end pipeline: pull a task from Redmine by ID, sanity-check and impact-assess it against the codebase before touching anything, implement it with the Claude CLI, verify the result in a real browser via the Claude Chrome extension (claude-in-chrome), and keep the Redmine ticket in sync throughout (in-progress…
web-drift
Use for the live-website agent-readiness audit, "run the web-drift loop", "audit our websites", "are our sites still readable by an agent", "web drift sweep", "check the public sites", or a scheduled site-audit cadence run. Enumerates every site the consumer declared in WEBDRIFTSITES, probes each over read-only HTTP…
shipyard-executing-plans
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute, either in the current session with builder/reviewer agents or in a separate session with review checkpoints. Also use when the user says "build this", "implement this", "execute the plan", "run the plan", or when a plan file has been loaded with independent…