Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to speakeasy-api/gram. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/speakeasy-api/gram/main/.agents/skills/pr-demo-gif/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/speakeasy-api/gramWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/speakeasy-api/gram/pr-demo-gif)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/speakeasy-api/gram/pr-demo-gif"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/speakeasy-api/gram/pr-demo-gif/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/speakeasy-api/gram/pr-demo-gif"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/speakeasy-api/gram/pr-demo-gif.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.01464 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00732 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00293 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00146 |
Grade A, and why
pr-demo-gif scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 141 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 679ae649768f
pr-demo-gif is a skill published in the GitHub repository speakeasy-api/gram (266 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 1,464 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
printing-press-output-review
Internal sub-skill: agentic review of a printed CLI's sampled command output for plausibility issues that rule-based checks can't encode (substring-match relevance, format bugs, silent source drops, ranking failures). Invoked via the Skill tool by the main printing-press skill at Phase 4.85 and printing-press-polish…
stale-comments-audit
Audit and fix JavaScript, TypeScript, and Go comments that are verified as stale, orphaned, misleading, or redundant.
go-code-reviewer
Review Go code with a defect-first approach using repository policy (constitution.md first, then AGENTS.md fallback). Use for code review, PR review, quality checks, risk analysis, and regression detection.
go-review-lead
Orchestrate a comprehensive Go code review by triaging code changes, dispatching vertical review skills (security, concurrency, error, logic, performance, quality, test, observability) as parallel agents, then consolidating results into a unified report. Use for full Go PR review or comprehensive code review. Replaces…
go-performance-review
Review Go code for performance issues including slice/map pre-allocation, string concatenation, N+1 queries, connection pool configuration, sync.Pool, memory alignment, lock scope, buffered I/O, and HTTP transport tuning. Trigger when code contains make(), loops, database queries, string building, sync primitives…
go-quality-review
Review Go code for code quality, style, and modern Go practices including function length, nesting depth, naming, mutable globals, interface design, receiver consistency, modern Go idioms (slog, generics, typed atomics), and static analysis. Trigger when reviewing Go code structure, readability, or maintainability.…