Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add SpillwaveSolutions/agent-brain --skill gsd-ui-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SpillwaveSolutions/agent-brainWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/spillwavesolutions/agent-brain/gsd-ui-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/spillwavesolutions/agent-brain/gsd-ui-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/spillwavesolutions/agent-brain/gsd-ui-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/spillwavesolutions/agent-brain/gsd-ui-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/spillwavesolutions/agent-brain/gsd-ui-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00669 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00268 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00134 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00067 |
Grade A, and why
gsd-ui-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
6 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- gsd-ui-review — 86% identical, 6 lines differ
- gsd-undo — 84% identical, 29 lines differ
- gsd-ui-phase — 77% identical, 24 lines differ
- gsd-new-project — 77% identical, 48 lines differ
- gsd-analyze-dependencies — 77% identical, 30 lines differ
- gsd-do — 73% identical, 28 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 67 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
<codex_skill_adapter>
A. Skill Invocation
- This skill is invoked by mentioning
$gsd-ui-review. - Treat all user text after
$gsd-ui-reviewas{{GSD_ARGS}}. - If no arguments are present, treat
{{GSD_ARGS}}as empty.
B. AskUserQuestion → request_user_input Mapping
GSD workflows use AskUserQuestion (Claude Code syntax). Translate to Codex request_user_input:
Parameter mapping:
header→headerquestion→question- Options formatted as
"Label" — description→{label: "Label", description: "description"} - Generate
idfrom header: lowercase, replace spaces with underscores
Batched calls:
AskUserQuestion([q1, q2])→ singlerequest_user_inputwith multiple entries inquestions[]
Multi-select workaround:
- Codex has no
multiSelect. Use sequential single-selects, or present a numbered freeform list asking the user to enter comma-separated numbers.
Execute mode fallback:
- When
request_user_inputis rejected (Execute mode), present a plain-text numbered list and pick a reasonable default.
C. Task() → spawn_agent Mapping
GSD workflows use Task(...) (Claude Code syntax). Translate to Codex collaboration tools:
Direct mapping:
Task(subagent_type="X", prompt="Y")→spawn_agent(agent_type="X", message="Y")Task(model="...")→ omit (Codex uses per-role config, not inline model selection)fork_context: falseby default — GSD agents load their own context via<files_to_read>blocks
Parallel fan-out:
- Spawn multiple agents → collect agent IDs →
wait(ids)for all to complete
Result parsing:
- Look for structured markers in agent output:
CHECKPOINT,PLAN COMPLETE,SUMMARY, etc. close_agent(id)after collecting results from each agent </codex_skill_adapter>
<execution_context> @/Users/richardhightower/clients/spillwave/src/agent-brain/.codex/get-shit-done/workflows/ui-review.md @/Users/richardhightower/clients/spillwave/src/agent-brain/.codex/get-shit-done/references/ui-brand.md </execution_context>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 67 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 5a7e71880eea
gsd-ui-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository SpillwaveSolutions/agent-brain (119 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 669 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
ui-canvas
Use when a product journey, production component path, UI/UX operation sequence, visual regression, or alignment review must be represented or audited in /ui-canvas with implementation-spec references, immutable versions, task-bound screenshots, and a persisted ReportCard.
install-openviking-memory
Install and configure the OpenViking long-term memory plugin for OpenClaw via natural conversation. Once installed, the plugin automatically captures facts from chats and recalls relevant context before each reply (auto-capture + auto-recall, cross-session). Covers prerequisites, install through OpenClaw's plugin…
daily-report
Compile timestamped conversation logs, agent sessions, IM messages, collaborative documents, meeting notes, task records, and similar OpenViking materials into concise, evidence-grounded daily reports. Use with ov compile when the user asks for a daily work report, end-of-day digest, 日报, or reports for one or more…
knowledge-distillation
Compile one or more OpenViking knowledge bases or document collections into topic-organized, evidence-grounded high-level knowledge, including cross-source findings, trends, changes, drivers, comparisons, implications, and uncertainties. Use with ov compile when the user asks to distill or synthesize a knowledge base…
tmux
Remote-control tmux sessions for interactive CLIs by sending keystrokes and scraping pane output.
ov-skills
Load when an agent needs to manage, install, update, remove, or validate OpenViking skills via the ov skills CLI. Trigger on explicit user requests about skill management, when the user mentions ov skills, install skill, update skill, delete skill, validate skill, or when an agent needs to discover what skills are…