Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add spiralcrew-ou/profilespider-agent-skills --skill supplier-qualificationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/spiralcrew-ou/profilespider-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/spiralcrew-ou/profilespider-agent-skills/supplier-qualification)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/spiralcrew-ou/profilespider-agent-skills/supplier-qualification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/spiralcrew-ou/profilespider-agent-skills/supplier-qualification/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/spiralcrew-ou/profilespider-agent-skills/supplier-qualification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/spiralcrew-ou/profilespider-agent-skills/supplier-qualification.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00443 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00177 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00089 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
supplier-qualification scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Supplier Qualification
Purpose
Assess potential suppliers against defined commercial, operational, and compliance requirements.
When to use this skill
- Shortlisting suppliers from a sourcing long-list
- Comparing vendors against the same requirements
- Surfacing compliance or location risks early
- Documenting why a supplier is in or out
When not to use this skill
- You have no defined requirements or risk criteria
- You need audited financials the records do not contain
- Final selection requires legal or compliance sign-off this cannot replace
Required inputs
- Supplier records
- Product or service requirements
- Risk and compliance criteria
Optional inputs
- Location requirements
- Capacity or volume needs
- Certifications required
- Budget or pricing band
Rules
- Score only against the supplied requirements.
- Use evidence from the records; do not assume certifications or capacity.
- Distinguish stated facts from inferences.
- Flag compliance-relevant gaps explicitly.
- Apply criteria consistently to every supplier.
Process
- Parse requirements and risk criteria.
- Evaluate each supplier against them.
- Identify strengths and risks with evidence.
- Score fit from 0 to 100.
- List missing information and recommend a next step.
Output format
Return one record per supplier with the following fields:
- supplier_fit_score
- strengths
- risks
- missing_information
- recommended_next_step
Validation
- Confirm risks and strengths cite record evidence.
- Confirm compliance gaps are surfaced, not assumed away.
- Confirm scores are comparable across suppliers.
Limitations
- A record-based screen is not due diligence; verify before contracting.
- Certifications listed in data should be independently confirmed.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 84 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 2143c83387d2
supplier-qualification is a skill published in the GitHub repository spiralcrew-ou/profilespider-agent-skills (11 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 443 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
supplier-qualification compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| supplier-qualificationspiralcrew-ou/profilespider-agent-skills | Skill | 11 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 38 | Claude Code, Codex |
| product-information-managementfinsilabs/awesome-ecommerce-skills | Skill | 63 | 15d ago | MIT | A | 31 | Claude Code, Codex |
| amazon-reviews-api-skillbrowser-act/skills | Skill | 6.3k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 124 | Claude Code, Codex |
| amazon-competitor-analyzerbrowser-act/skills | Skill | 6.3k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 48 | Claude Code, Codex |
| asc-subscription-localizationrorkai/app-store-connect-cli-skills | Skill | 1.1k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 60 | Claude Code |
| food-orderBitterbot-AI/bitterbot-desktop | Skill | 2.5k | yesterday | MIT | A | 53 | Claude Code, Codex |
| external-purchasesrshankras/claude-code-apple-skills | Skill | 864 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 76 | Claude Code |