Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to sponge-b0b/Polaris. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sponge-b0b/Polaris/main/.agents/skills/verify-ticket-decomposition/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sponge-b0b/PolarisWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sponge-b0b/polaris/verify-ticket-decomposition)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sponge-b0b/polaris/verify-ticket-decomposition"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sponge-b0b/polaris/verify-ticket-decomposition/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sponge-b0b/polaris/verify-ticket-decomposition"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sponge-b0b/polaris/verify-ticket-decomposition.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.03829 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.01532 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00766 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00383 |
Grade A, and why
verify-ticket-decomposition scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 277 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Verify Ticket Decomposition
Independently certify or reject one exact frozen $to-tickets proposal before human approval.
$to-ticketsmay author and self-check the decomposition, but it may not independently certify its own semantic carry.
This verifier exists to catch omissions, semantic compression, misrouting, or hidden design delegation in the exact proposed ticket contracts. It is not a second decomposition author, a general adversarial review, or an implementation verifier.
Invocation Boundary
Normal invocation is internal to $to-tickets after parent-owned TICKET PROPOSAL READINESS: PASS and before the proposal is shown for approval.
For one substantive proposal lifecycle, $to-tickets dispatches exactly one genuinely fresh verifier context executing this skill. The parent remains the orchestration and mutation owner.
The fresh verifier is:
- fresh — it did not author, route, or repair the proposal;
- non-mutating — it may read/search/inspect only;
- non-delegating — it may not spawn another semantic verifier or challenger;
- candidate-bound — it certifies exactly one supplied proposal identity and source state;
- source-grounded — parent matrices and findings are retrieval maps, not semantic authority.
If the verifier returns FAIL and the parent repairs the proposal, resume the same verifier context against the revised exact candidate when the execution environment supports continuation. Do not start a fresh challenger cascade. If that verifier context becomes unavailable, treat the prior certification attempt as invalid and use only one replacement recovery verifier, with the replacement disclosed in the final readiness summary.
Metadata-only deterministic normalization that $to-tickets is already authorized to publish without substantive approval does not require this semantic verifier.
Required Dispatch Packet
The parent supplies a compact retrieval packet containing:
Source artifact: <durable identity>
Mode: fresh | remediation
Source state identity: <Spec Body Hash + Spec Contract Hash + root hashes or equivalent durable identities>
Parent TCM identity: <persisted pre-publication Spec Body Hash + Spec Contract Hash when a TCM exists>
Proposal identity: <sha256 of exact rendered proposal>
Exact proposed ticket bodies/actions: <complete candidate>
Parent coverage candidate: <exact rendered manifest/delta, including proposed Spec Body Hash + Spec Contract Hash when the TCM is part of substantive reconciliation>
Spec obligation routing: <IDs + dispositions>
Architecture/design source inventory: <durable source identities + anchors + dispositions>
Normative source-unit / ARCHSRC routing: <IDs + source anchors + dispositions>
Parent semantic-carry evidence: <compact rows/pointers>
Parent semantic-consumer impact evidence: <None | compact changed-invariant/consumer rows when remediation or changed authority makes it applicable>
Parent Context-Fit Manifest: <per-ticket scenario/domain/modality/proof-family summary + disposition>
Design-delegation result: <compact rows/pointers>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago Changed · +24 lines da5e3b2e19ce
- 20d ago Changed · +61 lines 653038480d3f
- 1mo ago Changed · +38 lines 68d9929b5378
- 1mo ago Changed · +7 lines 33acba257467
- 1mo ago First seen · 147 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A c1214541cf0e
verify-ticket-decomposition is a skill published in the GitHub repository sponge-b0b/Polaris (4 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 3,829 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-18.
Other skills, from other repositories
tech-debt
Track, categorize and prioritize technical debt across the codebase — scans for debt indicators, maintains a register.
pr-review-triage
Watch open PRs, check CI status, review staleness, merge conflicts, and unanswered review comments. Produces a prioritized watchlist.
issue-creation
Trigger: issue creation, bug reports, feature requests, or issue approval. Create and triage GitHub issues from repository evidence.
systemic-issue-triage
Trigger: new issue, bug report, triage, backlog, issue flood, community report, root cause, dead-end, blocked user. Attack issues by root class, never one-by-one; fixes must shrink the system, not grow it.
spec-kitty-runtime-review
Review runtime-owned outputs using the Spec Kitty review workflow surface, then direct approval or rejection with structured feedback. Triggers: "review this work package", "check runtime output", "approve this step", "review WP", "is this WP ready to approve", "check this implementation". Does NOT handle: setup-only…
feature-dev
Guide a feature implementation through a structured seven-phase workflow with deep codebase understanding, clarifying questions, parallel architecture design, and quality review. Use this skill when the user asks to build a new feature, add functionality, or wants a methodical approach to implementation rather than…