Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sprngr/rubber-duck --skill quackgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sprngr/rubber-duckWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sprngr/rubber-duck/quack)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sprngr/rubber-duck/quack"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sprngr/rubber-duck/quack/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sprngr/rubber-duck/quack"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sprngr/rubber-duck/quack.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.01241 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00620 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00248 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00124 |
Grade A, and why
quack scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 87 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Skill: quack
Explicit route control 🦆. Alias-first auto-route, else one targeted disambiguation question.
Purpose
Provide explicit user-controlled routing for workflow-like requests while preserving safety and approval constraints.
Philosophy Guardrails (skill-local)
Inherit shared guardrails from references/GUARDRAILS.md.
- ask 1-3 targeted clarifying questions when context is incomplete
- state assumptions explicitly when evidence is missing
Activation
Use only when user explicitly invokes quack; do not auto-activate from inferred intent.
Method
- Verify explicit
quackinvocation. - Normalize intent: strip separator after
quack(:,-,—), strip outer matching quotes, strip trailing punctuation (?!.;:). - Bare
quack(heartbeat path):- If normalized intent is empty or whitespace-only:
- Read
assets/heartbeat.mdand select one random heartbeat line from the list - Read and emit full
assets/quick-help.mdcontent verbatim (no summarization) - Emit closing prompt:
What would you like to route? - Stop (do not generate ad-hoc quips, do not enter disambiguation)
- Read
- If normalized intent is empty or whitespace-only:
- Parse optional override:
use <subagent>orwith <subagent>orvia <subagent>. - Validate override (if present) against platform subagent list; if invalid, ask one correction question:
Need one detail: unknown subagent "<x>". Use duckling or general?and stop. - Determine effective subagent: if override parsed in step 4, use that; otherwise default to
duckling. - Determine route execution policy:
- inline-default:
duck-design,duck-teach,duck-debug,duck-debt - delegated-default:
duck-patch,duck-refactor,duck-risk,duck-review,duck-triage,duck-simplify - user override forces delegation regardless of default policy
- inline-default:
- If explicit full skill name in input, resolve that skill and execute route (see step 11).
- Otherwise, load
assets/route-aliases.jsonand attempt case-insensitive match. - Apply keyword-based precedence (when multiple skills match):
- Scan intent for precedence keywords:
- Risk signals (
rollback,breaking,compatibility,compat,failure,impact) -> prioritizeduck-risk - Complexity signals (
overengineered,complexity,simpler,too many,bloated) -> prioritizeduck-simplify - Learning signals (
why,how,what does,explain,teach me) -> prioritizeduck-teachoverduck-debug - Test signals (
test,coverage,should I test,before PR) -> prioritizeduck-triage - Design signals (
choose,tradeoff,approach,option) -> prioritizeduck-design
- Risk signals (
- Reorder matched skills with precedence-matched skill first
- Still present alternatives (precedence aids ranking, doesn't eliminate choice)
- Scan intent for precedence keywords:
- If multiple aliases match after precedence, apply tie-break: exact match > longest alias > ask one disambiguation question.
- Route execution (explicit skill name or alias match):
- Load role instructions from
assets/subagent-runbook.mdfor resolved skill - If inline-default policy AND no user override:
- execute skill inline first
- if execution fails, ask one corrective question and stop
- emit
Routing: <skill>.only after inline execution step completes
- Otherwise (delegated-default OR user override):
- delegate to subagent using harness-native dispatch tool with
subagent=<effective_subagent>(determined in step 6, defaults toduckling) first - pass
skill_name=<resolved_skill>parameter - if dispatch fails, ask one corrective question and stop
- emit
Routing: <skill> via <subagent>.if user override supplied, elseRouting: <skill>.only after dispatch succeeds
- delegate to subagent using harness-native dispatch tool with
- Do not stop at routing text alone when execution path is available.
- Load role instructions from
- Alias miss (disambiguation):
- Detect intent fragment and ask one targeted question:
- debug-ish (error/fail/trace/stack/broken):
Need one detail: is this debug, trace, or review? - rollout/risk (rollout/migration/compat/rollback):
Need one detail: is this risk review or design tradeoff? - code-change (fix/change/refactor/clean up):
Need one detail: do you want review, patch, refactor, or simplify? - tech-debt (todo/defer/fixme/debt):
Need one detail: is this debt audit or simplify? - unknown:
Need one detail: which route fits—review, debug, design, teach, triage, risk, simplify, patch, refactor, or debt?
- debug-ish (error/fail/trace/stack/broken):
- Wait for user clarification, then retry alias resolution.
- Detect intent fragment and ask one targeted question:
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 87 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 96b3ed6e1bb7
quack is a skill published in the GitHub repository sprngr/rubber-duck (8 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 1,241 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
expert-redteam-review
Use when a user asks to evaluate a complex, high-impact, ambiguous, cross-functional, or hard-to-reverse decision; mentions expert panel, red team, adversarial review, rebuttal, judge, arbitration, risk review, challenge assumptions, poke holes, or wants stronger decision quality than a normal review.
haiku
When writing a haiku for this bot, follow these conventions.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
taiyi-ui-design
A design-planning guide for describing how an application's user interface should look and behave. It produces a UI-DESIGN.md document covering layouts, components, interactions, accessibility, and error states.
ln-62-repository-publisher
Commits, pushes, and remotely verifies authorized repository changes. Not for releases, package publication, or announcements.
remove
Remove a deployed framework or addon from the current workspace.