Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add spyrae/gemini-plugin-cc --skill gemini-promptinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/spyrae/gemini-plugin-ccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/spyrae/gemini-plugin-cc/gemini-prompting)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/spyrae/gemini-plugin-cc/gemini-prompting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/spyrae/gemini-plugin-cc/gemini-prompting/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/spyrae/gemini-plugin-cc/gemini-prompting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/spyrae/gemini-plugin-cc/gemini-prompting.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00387 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00155 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00077 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
gemini-prompting scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Gemini Prompting Guide
When delegating tasks to Gemini via /gemini:rescue, structure the prompt effectively.
Prompt structure
TASK: [One sentence — what to achieve]
CONTEXT:
- Project type: [language/framework]
- Relevant files: [list key files]
- Current state: [what's working, what's broken]
CONSTRAINTS:
- [Patterns to follow]
- [Things that must not change]
- [Dependencies available]
EXPECTED OUTPUT:
- [What files to create/modify]
- [What the result should look like]
- [How to verify success]
Best practices
-
Be specific about files. Gemini doesn't know the codebase. Name the exact files and functions to modify.
-
Include error context. If debugging, paste the actual error message and stack trace.
-
Specify the framework. "Fix the Flutter test" is better than "fix the test". "Add a Riverpod provider" is better than "add state management".
-
Define done. What command should pass for the task to be complete? "Tests pass with
flutter test" or "Build succeeds withnpm run build". -
One task per prompt. Don't combine "fix the bug AND refactor the module AND add tests". Split into separate rescue calls.
Anti-patterns
- Vague prompts: "make it better" — better: "reduce the function from 80 lines to under 40 by extracting helpers"
- No context: "fix the auth" — better: "fix the JWT refresh in lib/auth.dart — it throws 401 on expired tokens"
- Too broad: "rewrite the app" — break into phases
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 49 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 812485242de0
gemini-prompting is a skill published in the GitHub repository spyrae/gemini-plugin-cc (2 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 387 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
gemini-prompting compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-promptingspyrae/gemini-plugin-cc | Skill | 2 | 7mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 16 | Claude Code |
| llm-app-patternsdavila7/claude-code-templates | Skill | 33k | today | MIT | A | 54 | Claude Code, Codex |
| prompt-engineerJeffallan/claude-skills | Skill | 12k | 7d ago | MIT | A | 93 | Claude Code |
| prompt-optimizationlangwatch/langwatch | Skill | 5.0k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 105 | Claude Code, Codex |
| omh-model-optimizationrlaope/oh-my-hermes | Skill | 5.2k | today | MIT | A | 84 | Claude Code, Codex |
| ideogram4digitalsamba/claude-code-video-toolkit | Skill | 2.5k | today | MIT | A | 99 | Claude Code |
| prompt-library-for-startupsaws/agent-toolkit-for-aws | Skill | 3.4k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 228 | Claude Code |