Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add squadcodercom/squadcoder --skill executegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/squadcodercom/squadcoderWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/squadcodercom/squadcoder/execute)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/squadcodercom/squadcoder/execute"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/squadcodercom/squadcoder/execute/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/squadcodercom/squadcoder/execute"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/squadcodercom/squadcoder/execute.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00557 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00223 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00111 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
compose:execute scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to compose:execute — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 72 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Executing Plans
Overview
Load plan, review critically, execute all tasks, report when complete.
Announce at start: "I'm using the compose:execute skill to implement this plan."
Note: Tell your human partner that Compose works much better with access to subagents. The quality of its work will be significantly higher if run on a platform with subagent support (such as Claude Code or Codex). If subagents are available, use compose:subagent instead of this skill.
The Process
Step 1: Load and Review Plan
- Read plan file
- Review critically - identify any questions or concerns about the plan
- If concerns: Raise them with your human partner before starting
- If no concerns: Create a task per plan task with the
tasktool and proceed
Step 2: Execute Tasks
For each task:
- Mark as in_progress
- Follow each step exactly (plan has bite-sized steps)
- Run verifications as specified
- Mark as completed
Step 3: Complete Development
After all tasks complete and verified:
- Use compose:report to write the final report (summarizes what was built in human-readable form)
- Report skill will transition to compose:merge on completion
When to Stop and Ask for Help
STOP executing immediately when:
- Hit a blocker (missing dependency, test fails, instruction unclear)
- Plan has critical gaps preventing starting
- You don't understand an instruction
- Verification fails repeatedly
Use compose:ask to present the blocker and options rather than describing it in free text. If no user is available, resolve the blocker with your best judgment and continue.
When to Revisit Earlier Steps
Return to Review (Step 1) when:
- Partner updates the plan based on your feedback
- Fundamental approach needs rethinking
Don't force through blockers - stop and ask.
Remember
- Review plan critically first
- Follow plan steps exactly
- Don't skip verifications
- Reference skills when plan says to
- Stop when blocked, don't guess
- Never start implementation on main/master branch without explicit user consent
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 72 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 1dea040b5caf
compose:execute is a skill published in the GitHub repository squadcodercom/squadcoder (12 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 557 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to compose:execute, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
tool-prompt-optimization
Optimize the description prompts an AI agent reads to learn its built-in tools (the .md files under prompts/tools/). Two halves: (1) measure how much of a prompt is already inferable from the tool's JSON parameter schema + name, to prune redundancy with evidence; (2) house authoring rules for what belongs in a tool…
semantic-compression
Re-encode verbose prose into a dense telegraphic register — punctuation as connectives, label frames, verbless assertions — without losing normativity or precision. Use when compressing system prompts, tool/function descriptions, skill bodies, or agent instructions; reducing token count or context bloat; making…
write-zot-themes
Help the user create, install, or package zot themes, including theme-only extensions.
writing-git-commits
Write clear, focused Git commit messages and keep commits easy to review.
hatch3r-board-groom
Ongoing backlog refinement for existing board items. Re-prioritize, reclassify, re-scope, archive stale items, decompose oversized issues, merge duplicates, refresh dependencies, and remediate board health findings.
hatch3r-cli-toolbox
Category-indexed reference for 34 specialist CLI tools beyond the always-on five (ripgrep, jq, gh, fd, fzf). Use to pick the right tool for HTTP clients, ai-chat, structural-search, sed-style edits, data ops, browser automation, container ops, and more.