Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ssbun/csl-agent-kit/deliberatenpx skills add SSBun/csl-agent-kit --skill deliberategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SSBun/csl-agent-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ssbun/csl-agent-kit/deliberate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ssbun/csl-agent-kit/deliberate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ssbun/csl-agent-kit/deliberate.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00089 | $0.01492 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.00746 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00298 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00149 |
Grade A, and why
deliberate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 101 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Deliberate
Contract
- Use a Coordinator, a Synthesizer, and an independent Challenger. The Coordinator may synthesize, never challenge.
- Route exchanges through the Coordinator; reuse both roles and send complete state.
- Prefer real isolated subagents for the Synthesizer and Challenger when the host can dispatch them; fall back to inline role-play with
ISOLATION: simulateddisclosed. Follow Subagent Dispatch. - Discuss internally first. Ask only about material user-owned choices that research, reasoning, or a reversible default cannot settle.
- Process every related topic and visible issue per pass; never drip-feed known issues.
- Set no round limit. Use
CONTINUEonly for a material open issue with a concrete next-pass change; otherwise stop or pause. - Without any Challenger role, disclose that the discussion cannot run. In
INLINE-FALLBACK, a simulated Challenger may returnSUFFICIENTonly withISOLATION: simulateddisclosed; never present simulated convergence as independent sufficiency. - Persist every delivered result under the owning task's
tasks/artifacts/<task-id>/discussions/; create other resources only when authorized. If the owning canonical task ID is unavailable, return to task activation before writing.
State
Have the Coordinator maintain and transmit:
QUESTION AND GOAL:
CONSTRAINTS / NON-GOALS:
FACTS / SOURCES:
TOPIC BUNDLE:
ASSUMPTIONS / DEFAULTS:
CURRENT ANSWER:
ISSUES / RESOURCES:
LIMITATIONS / USER DECISIONS:
Give each topic a fixed T-ID. Allocate D-IDs monotonically; never reuse or renumber them, and reopen an issue under its original ID. Send the complete answer, not a diff.
Follow Resource Handoff. Verify access; changed resources invalidate dependent conclusions.
Workflow
0. Resolve dispatch mode
Detect the host's dispatch capability, verify the dispatch path is actually ready (on Pi: the pi-agent carrier is registered and spawnable; on Codex: the host can spawn an agent process), record the mode and per-role readiness once per run, and print the dispatch metadata table to the user as the first output of the run — before any role pass — as specified in Subagent Dispatch. If all roles are ready, enter SUBAGENT mode without asking; if any role is missing, present the table and ask the user whether to proceed in INLINE-FALLBACK, and enter it only on explicit confirmation. Never enter the loop on an unverified dispatch path. In SUBAGENT mode, run the Synthesizer and Challenger as isolated subagents for every pass; in INLINE-FALLBACK mode, run them inline with ISOLATION: simulated. The state packet, D-ID/T-ID ledger, and CONTINUE/SUFFICIENT rules are identical in both modes.
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed 435e74ded6cd
- 4d ago First seen · 101 lines · 89 tokens per session scan A 413a1d56a226
deliberate is a skill published in the GitHub repository SSBun/csl-agent-kit (10 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 89 tokens to every session and 1,492 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…