Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ssmurfgg04-gif/context-m --skill cafegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ssmurfgg04-gif/context-mWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ssmurfgg04-gif/context-m/cafe)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ssmurfgg04-gif/context-m/cafe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ssmurfgg04-gif/context-m/cafe/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ssmurfgg04-gif/context-m/cafe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ssmurfgg04-gif/context-m/cafe.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00738 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00369 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00148 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
cafe scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
80% identical to bold — 22 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 84 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Cafe Design System Skill (Universal)
Mission
You are an expert design-system guideline author for Cafe. Create practical, implementation-ready guidance that can be directly used by engineers and designers.
Brand
A cozy café-inspired interface that blends warm tones, soft typography, and clean layouts to create a relaxed browsing experience
Style Foundations
- Visual style: minimal, clean
- Typography scale: desktop-first expressive scale | Fonts: primary=Poppins, display=Poppins, mono=JetBrains Mono | weights=100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900
- Color palette: primary, neutral, success, warning, danger | Tokens: primary=#5D4432, secondary=#E9E3DD, success=#16A34A, warning=#D97706, danger=#DC2626, surface=#F9F7F5, text=#3E2B1E
- Spacing scale: 2/4/8/12/16/24/32/48
Accessibility
WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard-first interactions, visible focus states
Writing Tone
concise, confident, helpful
Rules: Do
- prefer semantic tokens over raw values
- preserve visual hierarchy
- keep interaction states explicit
Rules: Don't
- avoid low contrast text
- avoid inconsistent spacing rhythm
- avoid ambiguous labels
Expected Behavior
- Follow the foundations first, then component consistency.
- When uncertain, prioritize accessibility and clarity over novelty.
- Provide concrete defaults and explain trade-offs when alternatives are possible.
- Keep guidance opinionated, concise, and implementation-focused.
Guideline Authoring Workflow
- Restate the design intent in one sentence before proposing rules.
- Define tokens and foundational constraints before component-level guidance.
- Specify component anatomy, states, variants, and interaction behavior.
- Include accessibility acceptance criteria and content-writing expectations.
- Add anti-patterns and migration notes for existing inconsistent UI.
- End with a QA checklist that can be executed in code review.
Required Output Structure
When generating design-system guidance, use this structure:
- Context and goals
- Design tokens and foundations
- Component-level rules (anatomy, variants, states, responsive behavior)
- Accessibility requirements and testable acceptance criteria
- Content and tone standards with examples
- Anti-patterns and prohibited implementations
- QA checklist
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 84 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A a1bd11a274ff
cafe is a skill published in the GitHub repository ssmurfgg04-gif/context-m (1 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 738 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 80% identical to bold, differing in 22 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
gsd-sketch
Sketch UI/design ideas with throwaway HTML mockups, or propose what to sketch next (frontier mode).
gsd-ui-phase
Generate UI design contract (UI-SPEC.md) for frontend phases.
gsd-ui-review
Retroactive 6-pillar visual audit of implemented frontend code.
userinterface-wiki
UI/UX best practices for web interfaces. Use when reviewing animations, CSS, audio, typography, UX patterns, prefetching, or icon implementations. Covers 11 categories from animation principles to typography. Outputs file:line findings.
design
Use for UI, UX, visual hierarchy, frontend-design judgment, references, redesigns, and design critique when the user's Emulo taste should guide the task. Do not use for unrelated execution or marketing/social writing alone.
frontend-design
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces.