Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/sssstwee/tastedistill/thinknpx skills add sssstwee/tastedistill --skill thinkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sssstwee/tastedistillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sssstwee/tastedistill/think)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sssstwee/tastedistill/think"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sssstwee/tastedistill/think.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.00521 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00260 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00104 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
think scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- tasted-think — 98% identical, 2 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 62 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Think: Decide Before Building
Use this skill when the main work is judgment, scope, or plan design.
Prefix your first response line with ⚗️ inline, not as its own paragraph.
Before the workflow, apply ../../shared-rules/personalization.md for explicit TasteD/TasteDistill invocations.
Outcome Contract
- Outcome: a decision, rationale, risks, and an executable plan.
- Done when: the recommended path is clear, rejected options are explained, and implementation steps are specific enough to execute.
- Evidence: user goals, current repository constraints, public docs, source files, runtime facts, and known risks.
Workflow
- Restate the decision to be made.
- List constraints that materially affect the answer.
- Compare viable options with tradeoffs.
- Pick one recommendation and explain why it fits the current goal.
- Write an implementation plan with verification steps.
- Name assumptions that must be checked before or during execution.
Coding Guardrails
For implementation plans, apply ../../shared-rules/coding-guardrails.md:
- Think before coding: surface assumptions that affect scope, behavior, cost, or rollback.
- Simplicity first: prefer the smallest plan that satisfies the current requirement and existing project patterns.
- Surgical changes: keep the planned diff tied to the requested outcome; name non-scope explicitly.
- Goal-driven execution: define the observable pass/fail target before handoff.
CodeGraph
For plans that change existing code in a Git repository, ../../shared-rules/personalization.md should already have ensured the local CodeGraph index. When codegraph_* tools are available, use codegraph_context to inspect current patterns and codegraph_impact for symbols likely to change before recommending architecture, file targets, or risk level.
Output Shape
Recommendation:
Why:
Rejected options:
Implementation plan:
Verification:
Risks:
Assumptions:
Non-scope:
Do Not
- Hide major tradeoffs.
- Invent requirements.
- Expand scope beyond the user's goal.
- Turn a debugging symptom into a planning exercise.
- Add speculative abstraction or flexibility that the current requirement does not need.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 62 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 49894818bfc8
think is a skill published in the GitHub repository sssstwee/tastedistill (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 521 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
weekly-digests
Generate a serial week-by-week narrative digest of a project's full claude-mem timeline. Splits the timeline into per-ISO-week files, then runs one consecutive subagent per week — each receiving the prior week's carry-forward block — to produce one chapter per ISO week of data. Use when asked for "weekly digests"…
version-bump
Automated semantic versioning and release workflow for Claude Code plugins. Handles version increments across package.json, marketplace.json, plugin.json manifests, build verification, git tagging, GitHub releases, and changelog generation. NPM publishing is the final human-required handoff because the maintainer…
cloud-sync
Set up or check claude-mem cloud sync with cmem.ai Pro. Use when the user says "set up cloud sync", "sync my memories", "cmem pro", "cloud backup", "sync status", or wants their memory database backed up or synced to their cmem.ai account.
ix
This skill should be used when answering structural questions about a codebase: understanding what a symbol is, tracing flows, measuring change impact, finding callers/callees/imports, or detecting code smells. It drives the Ix CLI (ix map/explain/trace/impact/search/rank/smells) against a persistent code graph stored…
memory-audit-pattern-extraction
模式提取与失效解药分析。当发现多条记忆在讲同一个教训,或发现自己在一而再再而三地犯同样的错误时使用。.
services-audit-cron
Use when scheduling the canonical biweekly services-audit cron loop for Empirica's AI service scanner (Phase 3). The auditor body is empirica services-audit — captures a fresh scan, diffs against the previous, and emits a notification when novel running services appear. This skill provides the prompt template that…