Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/stacklok/toolhive/doc-reviewnpx skills add stacklok/toolhive --skill doc-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/stacklok/toolhiveWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00180 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00090 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00036 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00018 |
Grade A, and why
doc-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Documentation Review
Instructions
- Read the documentation you are instructed to review
- Make sure that all claims about how toolhive works are accurate
- Make sure that all examples are based in how toolhive really works, check for formatting, typos and overall accuracy
- Make sure that all links point to existing files and the content of the links matches what it should
Fact-checking claims in the documentation
See CHECKING.md on instructions on how to check claims in the docs.
You have some examples on how to fact-check in EXAMPLES.md
Your report
- Do not suggest inline changes
- Present findings and put each into a todo list. The user will then go through them and review manually
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 25 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A 870affe59ffc
doc-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository stacklok/toolhive (2,065 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 180 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
testing-mcp-server-security
Testing Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers and the clients that consume them for tool poisoning, prompt injection via tool descriptions/outputs, over-permissioned and local-credential-stealing tools, config/trust bypasses, and unauthenticated RCE during authorized penetration tests of AI agent infrastructure.
mcp-redteam
Security audit of MCP servers. Safe mode (default) = source analysis + read-only probing. Active mode = controlled payload testing.
brin-check
Scan packages, repositories, MCP servers, domains, web pages, and agent skills for security threats using the brin API. Use this skill before installing dependencies, visiting URLs, or integrating external resources.
browser-control
Requires BROWSERAPIKEY in .env.
browser-skill
Imported from OpenClaw migration.
bugcrowd-reporting
Bugcrowd-specific reporting tactics complementing report-writing: VRT category search-and-fallback strategy when no exact match exists, manual severity override when VRT defaults underrate impact, severity-request paragraph as first body section, OOS-clause rebuttal templates (rate limiting on auth-flow endpoints…