Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Stahl-G/briefloop. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Stahl-G/briefloop/main/.agents/skills/final-quality-harness/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Stahl-G/briefloopWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/stahl-g/briefloop/final-quality-harness)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stahl-g/briefloop/final-quality-harness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stahl-g/briefloop/final-quality-harness.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00285 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00143 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00057 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
final-quality-harness scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Final Quality Harness Skill Contract
Scope
This is a runtime skill contract. It describes the capability and artifact contract for this role.
It is not the platform-specific subagent definition. Claude Code subagents live in .claude/agents/; OpenCode subagents live in .opencode/agents/; Codex custom agents live in .codex/agents/; Hermes child tasks are created through delegate_task.
Purpose
Review final text delivery gates for publication readiness.
Use When
Use when changing final report depth, quiet-week handling, front-page metadata, stale-current framing, executive summary quality, or internal residue checks.
Inputs
output/delivery/brief.mdoutput/delivery/<named>.docxwhen DOCX delivery is configuredoutput/intermediate/audit_report.json- final quality rule code or tests
Outputs
- final quality findings
- updated final quality rules or tests when requested
Work
- Check whether reader-facing output is publication-ready after factual audit.
- Identify delivery blockers that are not source-support problems.
- Keep final quality checks as harness rules and regression tests.
Handoff
Return delivery readiness status and any blocking final-quality issues.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 43 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A ca68ae614e51
final-quality-harness is a skill published in the GitHub repository Stahl-G/briefloop (9 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 285 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
geo-proposal
Auto-generate a professional, client-ready GEO service proposal from audit data. Creates a full proposal in markdown and PDF including executive summary, findings, recommended service packages (Basic/Standard/Premium), pricing, timeline, and terms. Use when user says "proposal", "proposta", "offerta", "preventivo"…
document-generation
Generate Word (.docx), Excel (.xlsx) and PowerPoint (.pptx) documents and fill existing PDF forms, from real NetClaw data, with per-element provenance and no fabrication. Use when someone needs a deliverable rather than an answer — a change record to attach to a CR, an audit workbook for a compliance reviewer, a…
network-report-documents
The four standard NetClaw document compositions — a change-record Word document from a real ServiceNow CR plus device state, an interface/config audit workbook from real device queries, an executive summary deck with an embedded topology diagram, and a required PDF form filled from real data. Use when an operator asks…
audit-export
Export the full CocoAudit trail as a stakeholder-ready compliance document.
geo-proposal
Auto-generate a professional, client-ready GEO service proposal from audit data. Creates a full proposal in markdown and PDF including executive summary, findings, recommended service packages (Basic/Standard/Premium), pricing, timeline, and terms. Use when user says "proposal", "proposta", "offerta", "preventivo"…
wuji-document-suite
Unified office-document Skill for Word, PDF, and spreadsheet creation, editing, rendering, redlining, and verification. Use whenever the primary deliverable is DOCX, PDF, XLSX, CSV, or a related office artifact.