Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to standardbeagle/mcp-tui. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/standardbeagle/mcp-tui/main/.claude/skills/implement-slice/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/standardbeagle/mcp-tuiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/standardbeagle/mcp-tui/implement-slice)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/standardbeagle/mcp-tui/implement-slice"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/standardbeagle/mcp-tui/implement-slice/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/standardbeagle/mcp-tui/implement-slice"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/standardbeagle/mcp-tui/implement-slice.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00070 | $0.01355 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00542 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00271 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00136 |
Grade A, and why
implement-slice scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 174 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Implement Vertical Slice (TDD)
Implement a feature as a complete vertical slice using strict RED/GREEN/REFACTOR discipline. Each slice delivers working functionality through all layers — not a horizontal layer across features.
Pre-Flight Checks
Before writing any code:
- Confirm the feature scope and acceptance criteria with the user
- Read
.claude/rules/architecture.mdfor active patterns and constraints - Read
.claude/rules/tdd.mdfor TDD discipline rules - Identify which layers this slice touches (validation, logic, data, API, UI)
- Verify the feature is small enough for one vertical slice (if not, split first)
Step 1 -- Write the Smoke Test (RED)
Write one end-to-end smoke test for the core user journey at HIGHEST fidelity.
Smoke Test Rules
- Full e2e — real UI (if applicable), real backend, real database
- NO mocks, stubs, or simulations
- Test the complete user journey from entry to exit
- Run it — it MUST FAIL (RED) because the feature doesn't exist yet
# Example: "User can create a post"
test("user creates a post and sees it in the list"):
navigate to /posts/new
fill in title and body
click submit
assert redirected to /posts
assert new post appears in list
Run with: go test (CLI subprocess + live MCP servers: npx server-everything, test-servers/*.js)
Commit: RED: Smoke test for [feature]
Step 2 -- Identify the Thinnest Slice
Break the feature into the smallest possible behavior increments. Each increment is ONE RED/GREEN/REFACTOR cycle.
Slice Planning
List the behaviors in implementation order (dependencies first):
Example for "User can create a post":
1. Post validation rejects empty title (pure logic)
2. Post can be persisted to database (data layer)
3. API endpoint accepts POST /posts (API layer)
4. UI form submits to API (presentation layer)
5. Success redirects to post list (navigation)
Each behavior becomes one TDD cycle. Order matters — build from the inside out, but always as a vertical slice (not all validation first, then all data, then all API).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 174 lines · 70 tokens per session scan A 20084e27a28f
implement-slice is a skill published in the GitHub repository standardbeagle/mcp-tui (12 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 70 tokens to every session and 1,355 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-28.
Other skills, from other repositories
implement
Implement a technical design by decomposing it into dependency-ordered vertical slices, executing each with TDD red-green, reviewing each via an isolated sub-agent, and persisting progress to a state file so work survives session restarts. Use when the user has a tech design (doc or settled conversation) and says…
agent-e2e-test-specialist
Specialist subagent: Playwright, Cypress, and visual regression testing specialist. Use only when the user explicitly asks for E2E tests, browser test automation, or visual regression testing. Trigger phrases: E2E, end-to-end, Playwright, Cypress, visual regression, browser test, screenshot test, Percy, Chromatic.
testing
TDD/BDD testing principles. Use when writing tests, reviewing test coverage, setting up testing, or discussing test strategy and test architecture.
cypress-ops
Cypress end-to-end and component testing operations - selector/retry-ability strategy, cy.intercept network stubbing, cy.session auth, component vs e2e, flake diagnosis, CI, Test Replay. Use for: cypress, e2e test, component test, cy.get, cy.intercept, cy.session, data-cy, data-test, retry-ability, flake, flaky test…
playwright-ops
Playwright end-to-end testing operations - selectors, fixtures, network mocking, auth, parallelism, CI, visual regression, flake hunting. Use for: playwright, e2e test, end-to-end testing, browser test, getByRole, page object, storageState, trace viewer, flaky test, test sharding, visual regression, toHaveScreenshot…
refactor-ops
Safe refactoring patterns - extract, rename, restructure with test-driven methodology and dead code detection. Use for: refactor, refactoring, extract function, extract component, rename, move file, restructure, dead code, unused imports, code smell, duplicate code, long function, god object, feature envy, DRY…