Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Stanshy/AgentHub --skill dev-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Stanshy/AgentHubWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/stanshy/agenthub/dev-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stanshy/agenthub/dev-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stanshy/agenthub/dev-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stanshy/agenthub/dev-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stanshy/agenthub/dev-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.01371 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00548 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00274 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00137 |
Grade A, and why
dev-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 146 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
開發計畫書產生器
G0 通過後,由 L1 產出標準化開發計畫書。
使用方式
/dev-plan <sprint-number> <project-name>
參數
$0: Sprint 編號$1: 專案名稱
執行步驟
-
讀取對應的提案書: !
cat proposal/sprint$0-proposal.md 2>/dev/null || echo "找不到 Sprint $0 提案書" -
讀取開發計畫書範本: !
cat .knowledge/templates/dev-plan.md.template 2>/dev/null || echo "範本未找到" -
建立規範文件(若不存在則建立,已存在則跳過):
⚠️ 規範文件是 Code Review「對規範」的比對對象,缺少 = Review 品質打折。 必須在 dev-plan 產出時一併建立,不得延後。
mkdir -p .knowledge/specs建立以下三個檔案(內容從提案書 + 技術方案提取):
檔案 內容 來源 .knowledge/specs/api-design.mdAPI 端點清單、請求/回應格式、錯誤碼 提案書需求 + 技術方案 .knowledge/specs/data-model.md資料表定義、欄位型別、關聯、索引 技術方案 DB 設計 .knowledge/specs/feature-spec.md功能規格、用戶流程、邊界條件、驗收標準 提案書功能清單 每個檔案格式:
# {標題} > 版本: v1.0 | Sprint {N} | 最後更新: {YYYY-MM-DD} ## 概述 {簡述} ## 詳細規格 {具體內容} -
建立 Sprint Branch:
BASE=$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD) # 記錄當前 base branch(main / master / 其他) git checkout -b sprint-$0若
sprint-$0branch 已存在,輸出警告並跳過(冪等)。$BASE將寫入 dev-plan metadata,供/sprint-close使用。 -
產出
proposal/sprint$0-dev-plan.md,包含:- 需求摘要(來自提案書)
- 技術方案
- 檔案變更清單
- 介面設計(如需要)
- 第 5 節:規範文件索引(指向
.knowledge/specs/下的三個檔案) - 第 6 節:任務拆解表(含依賴圖)
- 驗收標準
- 異常處理
- 時程預估
- 第 10 節:預建空表格(任務完成紀錄 / Review 紀錄 / Gate 紀錄)
第 10 節格式(強制)
⚠️ 此區域的表頭名稱與欄位順序被系統 parser (
parseDevPlanSection10) 嚴格依賴。 不得更改表頭名稱、欄位順序、或子標題名稱。
## 10. 任務與審核紀錄(備查)
> 每個任務完成後記錄結果,每次 Review/Gate 通過後記錄決策。本區作為 Sprint 完整稽核軌跡。
### 任務完成紀錄
| 任務 | 完成日期 | 結果 | 備註 |
|------|---------|------|------|
| T1 | | | |
| T2 | | | |
(依第 6 節任務清單預建所有任務行)
### Review 紀錄
| Review 步驟 | 日期 | 結果 | Review 文件連結 |
|------------|------|------|---------------|
| UI 圖稿 Review | | | |
| 實作 Review | | | |
| 測試 Review | | | |
(依確認流程中的步驟預建行)
### Gate 紀錄
| Gate | 日期 | 決策 | 審核意見 |
|------|------|------|---------|
| G0 | | | |
| G1 | | | |
(依確認流程中的 Gate 預建行,空行 = 未審核)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 146 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A b2973e05c853
dev-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository Stanshy/AgentHub (204 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 1,371 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
project-setup-info-local
Comprehensive setup steps to help the user create complete project structures in a VS Code workspace; this tool is designed for full project initialization and scaffolding, not for creating individual files. When to use this tool: user wants to create a new complete project from scratch; setting up entire project…
md-hive-sync
Munder Difflin hive sync — runs the start-of-task hive protocol steps: reads memory.md, checks inbox/ for new messages, and reminds you to record durable facts in memory.md and write coordination files before ending. Use when asked to "sync with the hive", "check my inbox", "hive status", or "hive sync". Proactively…
comet-native
A workflow for managing Native changes in Comet, where requirements, progress, and acceptance results are saved in project files. It uses the Comet command-line runtime to move through defined work stages.
comet-github-idea-to-issue
A workflow for turning a local idea, bug observation, or improvement proposal into a focused GitHub Issue draft. GitHub Issues are shared records for bugs, features, questions, and maintenance work.
generate-rfcs
Break the PRD into sequenced implementation RFCs under RFCs/ with an RFCS.md index, then cold-read each RFC for gaps.
create-request
Create, update, or scan per-task request tickets for progress tracking. These are date-prefixed non-lifecycle docs under requests/, NOT feature-level requirements (use /req-analyze for those). Use when: tracking task progress, updating completion status, scanning incomplete requests, checking request status dashboard.…