Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Stanshy/AgentHub --skill gate-recordgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Stanshy/AgentHubWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/stanshy/agenthub/gate-record)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stanshy/agenthub/gate-record"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stanshy/agenthub/gate-record/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stanshy/agenthub/gate-record"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stanshy/agenthub/gate-record.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00720 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00288 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00144 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00072 |
Grade A, and why
gate-record scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Gate 審核紀錄
在開發計畫書第 10 節附加 Gate 審核紀錄。
使用方式
/gate-record <gate-type> <decision> [comment]
參數
$0: Gate 類型（G0 / G1 / G2 / G3 / G4 / G5 / G6）$1: 決策（見下方格式規範）$ARGUMENTS: 完整參數（含審核意見）
格式規範（系統解析依賴，務必遵守）
Gate 類型（第 1 欄）
必須為：G0 / G1 / G2 / G3 / G4 / G5 / G6
決策（第 3 欄）— 嚴格使用以下純文字值
| 決策值 | 對應系統狀態 | 說明 |
|---|---|---|
✅ 通過 |
approved | 審核通過 |
❌ 駁回 |
rejected | 審核不通過 |
⚠️ 附條件通過 |
approved | 有條件通過 |
禁止使用其他格式（如純文字「通過」、英文「approved」）。 系統解析器
decisionToStatus()依賴上述關鍵字判斷狀態。
日期（第 2 欄）
格式：YYYY-MM-DD（如 2026-03-26）
審核意見（第 4 欄）
自由文字，簡述審核理由。
執行步驟
-
找到當前 Sprint 的 dev-plan： 使用 Glob tool 搜尋
proposal/sprint*-dev-plan.md，取最新的檔案路徑。 -
讀取 dev-plan 找到第 10 節的 Gate 紀錄表： 使用 Read tool 讀取上述 dev-plan 完整內容，找到
Gate 紀錄表格區段。 -
找到對應的 Gate 行（如
| G0 |），更新該行而非新增：- 如果該行已有資料（日期/決策非空），直接覆蓋
- 如果該行是空的（
| G0 | | | |），填入資料
| $0 | {YYYY-MM-DD} | {決策值} | {審核意見} |
- 使用 Edit 工具精確替換該行，不改動其他內容。
範例
| G0 | 2026-03-26 | ✅ 通過 | 老闆確認需求，提案通過 |
| G1 | 2026-03-27 | ❌ 駁回 | 圖稿缺少手機版響應式設計 |
| G2 | 2026-03-28 | ✅ 通過 | 程式碼品質合格 |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 67 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 8dac31e9025c
gate-record is a skill published in the GitHub repository Stanshy/AgentHub (204 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 720 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
project-setup-info-local
Comprehensive setup steps to help the user create complete project structures in a VS Code workspace; this tool is designed for full project initialization and scaffolding, not for creating individual files. When to use this tool: user wants to create a new complete project from scratch; setting up entire project…
md-hive-sync
Munder Difflin hive sync — runs the start-of-task hive protocol steps: reads memory.md, checks inbox/ for new messages, and reminds you to record durable facts in memory.md and write coordination files before ending. Use when asked to "sync with the hive", "check my inbox", "hive status", or "hive sync". Proactively…
comet-native
A workflow for managing Native changes in Comet, where requirements, progress, and acceptance results are saved in project files. It uses the Comet command-line runtime to move through defined work stages.
comet-github-idea-to-issue
A workflow for turning a local idea, bug observation, or improvement proposal into a focused GitHub Issue draft. GitHub Issues are shared records for bugs, features, questions, and maintenance work.
generate-rfcs
Break the PRD into sequenced implementation RFCs under RFCs/ with an RFCS.md index, then cold-read each RFC for gaps.
create-request
Create, update, or scan per-task request tickets for progress tracking. These are date-prefixed non-lifecycle docs under requests/, NOT feature-level requirements (use /req-analyze for those). Use when: tracking task progress, updating completion status, scanning incomplete requests, checking request status dashboard.…