Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Stanshy/AgentHub --skill project-kickoffgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Stanshy/AgentHubWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/stanshy/agenthub/project-kickoff)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stanshy/agenthub/project-kickoff"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stanshy/agenthub/project-kickoff/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stanshy/agenthub/project-kickoff"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stanshy/agenthub/project-kickoff.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00929 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00372 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00186 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
project-kickoff scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
專案初始化
PM 啟動新專案時使用,確保所有基礎結構就位。
使用方式
/project-kickoff <project-type> <project-name>
參數
$0: 專案類型(web-app / api-service / mobile-app / library)$ARGUMENTS: 完整參數
執行步驟
-
檢查現有結構
- 檢查 CLAUDE.md 是否已存在
- 檢查 .knowledge/ 目錄是否已存在
- 如已存在,提示確認是否覆蓋
-
部署 CLAUDE.md
- 從對應模板生成(替換
{專案名稱}佔位符) - 模板位置:AgentHub
.knowledge/company/project-templates/{type}/CLAUDE.md.template
- 從對應模板生成(替換
-
建立 .knowledge/ 結構
- 建立
.knowledge/目錄 - 複製
architecture.md(從模板目錄) - 建立空的
project-overview.md(標題 + 佔位符) - 建立空的
postmortem-log.md(標題 + 空表格) - 從模板部署
file-index.md(替換{專案名稱}、填入今日日期)- 模板位置:AgentHub
.knowledge/company/project-templates/{type}/file-index.md.template
- 模板位置:AgentHub
- 建立
-
部署共用規則
- 複製
company-rules.md→.knowledge/company-rules.md - 複製
team-workflow.md→.knowledge/team-workflow.md
- 複製
-
建立 Roadmap
5a. 建立
proposal/目錄(若已存在則跳過)5b. 建立
proposal/roadmap.md(若已存在則跳過):# {專案名稱} — 產品路線圖 ## 產品定位 > {一句話描述產品} ## 目標用戶 > {描述} ## 核心價值 > {描述} ## 版本規劃 | Sprint | 主題 | 目標 | 狀態 | |--------|------|------|------| | Sprint 1 | {待定} | {待定} | 🔲 規劃中 | ## 長期願景 > {描述} -
Git 初始化
6a. 檢查是否已有 git repo(
.git/目錄存在):- 已存在 → 跳過
git init - 不存在 → 執行
git init
6b. 建立
.gitignore(若已存在則跳過):node_modules/ dist/ .env .env.* .claude/ coverage/ *.log .DS_Store6c. 執行初始 commit(若 working tree 有變更):
git add -A git commit -m "chore: project kickoff — {project-name}" - 已存在 → 跳過
-
輸出下一步 Checklist
✅ 專案初始化完成 Git:已初始化 ✅ 初始 commit:chore: project kickoff — {project-name} ✅ Roadmap:proposal/roadmap.md ✅ 下一步: - [ ] 填寫 CLAUDE.md 專案簡介佔位符 - [ ] 填寫技術棧表格 - [ ] 填寫 proposal/roadmap.md 產品定位 - [ ] 執行 /product-diagnosis 做 G0 前置診斷 - [ ] 撰寫 Sprint 提案書(/sprint-proposal) - [ ] 執行 /dev-plan 建立 sprint branch
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 110 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A c7be468d5526
project-kickoff is a skill published in the GitHub repository Stanshy/AgentHub (204 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 929 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
project-setup-info-local
Comprehensive setup steps to help the user create complete project structures in a VS Code workspace; this tool is designed for full project initialization and scaffolding, not for creating individual files. When to use this tool: user wants to create a new complete project from scratch; setting up entire project…
md-hive-sync
Munder Difflin hive sync — runs the start-of-task hive protocol steps: reads memory.md, checks inbox/ for new messages, and reminds you to record durable facts in memory.md and write coordination files before ending. Use when asked to "sync with the hive", "check my inbox", "hive status", or "hive sync". Proactively…
comet-native
A workflow for managing Native changes in Comet, where requirements, progress, and acceptance results are saved in project files. It uses the Comet command-line runtime to move through defined work stages.
comet-github-idea-to-issue
A workflow for turning a local idea, bug observation, or improvement proposal into a focused GitHub Issue draft. GitHub Issues are shared records for bugs, features, questions, and maintenance work.
generate-rfcs
Break the PRD into sequenced implementation RFCs under RFCs/ with an RFCS.md index, then cold-read each RFC for gaps.
create-request
Create, update, or scan per-task request tickets for progress tracking. These are date-prefixed non-lifecycle docs under requests/, NOT feature-level requirements (use /req-analyze for those). Use when: tracking task progress, updating completion status, scanning incomplete requests, checking request status dashboard.…