requesting-code-review

requesting-code-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from StarryCod/cogitum. It costs 20 tokens per session (2,132 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of requesting-code-review, MIT.

A pre-commit check that examines your code changes before they are committed or pushed. It combines automated scans, quality checks, and a separate reviewer agent, with a loop for fixing reported issues.

In plain words
What is it for?
Verifying feature and bug-fix changes before committing, pushing, or merging them into a project.
Why use it?
It helps catch security problems, quality issues, and missed requirements before changes reach a shared branch. A separate reviewer can notice problems the author overlooked.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Good fit Verifying feature and bug-fix changes before committing, pushing, or merging them into a project.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/starrycod/cogitum/requesting-code-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add StarryCod/cogitum --skill requesting-code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/StarryCod/cogitum

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for requesting-code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/starrycod/cogitum/requesting-code-review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/starrycod/cogitum/requesting-code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/starrycod/cogitum/requesting-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/starrycod/cogitum/requesting-code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 20 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,132 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 92% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00020 $0.02132
Opus 5 $0.00010 $0.01066
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00426
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00213

Measured 3d ago against content hash cb7e3518c3be, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

requesting-code-review scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Runs shell commandslowCapability

Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.

os.system(f"ls {user_input}")
Origin

This is a copy

92% identical to requesting-code-review — 12 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

cogitum/data/skills/software-development/requesting-code-review/SKILL.md · 281 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 281 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Pre-Commit Code Verification

Automated verification pipeline before code lands. Static scans, baseline-aware quality gates, an independent reviewer subagent, and an auto-fix loop.

Core principle: No agent should verify its own work. Fresh context finds what you miss.

When to Use

  • After implementing a feature or bug fix, before git commit or git push
  • When user says "commit", "push", "ship", "done", "verify", or "review before merge"
  • After completing a task with 2+ file edits in a git repo
  • After each task in subagent-driven-development (the two-stage review)

Skip for: documentation-only changes, pure config tweaks, or when user says "skip verification".

This skill vs github-code-review: This skill verifies YOUR changes before committing. github-code-review reviews OTHER people's PRs on GitHub with inline comments.

Step 1 — Get the diff

git diff --cached

If empty, try git diff then git diff HEAD~1 HEAD.

If git diff --cached is empty but git diff shows changes, tell the user to git add <files> first. If still empty, run git status — nothing to verify.

If the diff exceeds 15,000 characters, split by file:

git diff --name-only
git diff HEAD -- specific_file.py

Step 2 — Static security scan

Scan added lines only. Any match is a security concern fed into Step 5.

# Hardcoded secrets
git diff --cached | grep "^+" | grep -iE "(api_key|secret|password|token|passwd)\s*=\s*['\"][^'\"]{6,}['\"]"

# Shell injection
git diff --cached | grep "^+" | grep -E "os\.system\(|subprocess.*shell=True"

# Dangerous eval/exec
git diff --cached | grep "^+" | grep -E "\beval\(|\bexec\("

# Unsafe deserialization
git diff --cached | grep "^+" | grep -E "pickle\.loads?\("

# SQL injection (string formatting in queries)
git diff --cached | grep "^+" | grep -E "execute\(f\"|\.format\(.*SELECT|\.format\(.*INSERT"

Step 3 — Baseline tests and linting

Detect the project language and run the appropriate tools. Capture the failure count BEFORE your changes as baseline_failures (stash changes, run, pop). Only NEW failures introduced by your changes block the commit.

Read the full file on GitHub · 281 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 281 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A cb7e3518c3be

Subscribe to this mod's changes

requesting-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository StarryCod/cogitum (11 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 2,132 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). It is 92% identical to requesting-code-review, differing in 12 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

bootstrap-repo-analysis

First-time analysis of a repository with no prior reviewer outcomes. Crawl historical merged-PR review feedback with the gh CLI (plus any preloaded samples), extract the team's review norms, and synthesize the initial per-repo review-style prompt. Use this for a cold-start repo; use continual-learning instead once the…

langchain-ai/open-swe · 73 tokens

continual-learning

Nightly refinement of an existing per-repo review-style prompt using this reviewer's own finding outcomes. Read confirmed (resolved-by-commit / thumbs-up) and dismissed (thumbs-down) findings, promote the bug patterns the team actually fixes, demote the false-positive patterns, reconcile against the current prompt…

langchain-ai/open-swe · 89 tokens

code-review

Review frontend code for best practices, bugs, and improvements. Use when reviewing PRs, checking code quality, or before committing.

echoVic/blade-code · 29 tokens

code-review

A code-review workflow that sends local changes to a separate reviewer for checks on correctness, style, performance, security, tests, and design.

open-octo/octo-agent · 67 tokens

pypi-release

This skill should be used when releasing tunacode-cli to PyPI. It keeps the existing local release checks, then hands the actual PyPI upload to a GitHub Actions workflow that uses the repository's PYPIAPITOKEN secret.

alchemiststudiosDOTai/tunacode · 52 tokens

audit-harness

Use when auditing HARNESS.md, pre-commit hooks, pre-push hooks, architecture gates, or CI workflows for tunacode-cli. This skill treats any mismatch, skipped gate, or failing check as a critical failure and requires manual one-by-one execution rather than make targets, batch wrappers, or summary-only audits.

alchemiststudiosDOTai/tunacode · 69 tokens