Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add staruhub/CrewClaw --skill acceptance-criteria-writergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/staruhub/CrewClawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/staruhub/crewclaw/acceptance-criteria-writer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/staruhub/crewclaw/acceptance-criteria-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/staruhub/crewclaw/acceptance-criteria-writer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/staruhub/crewclaw/acceptance-criteria-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/staruhub/crewclaw/acceptance-criteria-writer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00196 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00098 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00039 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00020 |
Grade A, and why
acceptance-criteria-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Acceptance Criteria Writer
Overview
Translate product intent into criteria that engineering and QA can verify.
When to Use
Use when a PRD has goals but lacks measurable completion criteria.
Workflow
- Restate the expected user behavior.
- Define preconditions and triggers.
- Define successful outcomes.
- Define failure outcomes.
- Write criteria in observable language.
Common Pitfalls
- Do not use criteria like "works well".
- Do not hide important conditions in prose.
- Do not make implementation choices unless required by the requirement.
Verification Checklist
- Each criterion is testable.
- Success and failure states are included.
- Ambiguous adjectives are removed.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 38 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 6da47c0491da
acceptance-criteria-writer is a skill published in the GitHub repository staruhub/CrewClaw (22 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 196 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
mle-workflow
Production machine-learning engineering workflow for data contracts, reproducible training, model evaluation, deployment, monitoring, and rollback. Use when building, reviewing, or hardening ML systems beyond one-off notebooks.
autonomous-loops
Patterns and architectures for autonomous Claude Code loops — from simple sequential pipelines to RFC-driven multi-agent DAG systems.
react-patterns
React 18/19 patterns including hooks discipline, server/client component boundaries, Suspense + error boundaries, form actions, data fetching, state management decision trees, and accessibility-first composition. Use when writing or reviewing React components.
article-writing
Write articles, guides, blog posts, tutorials, newsletter issues, and other long-form content in a distinctive voice derived from supplied examples or brand guidance. Use when the user wants polished written content longer than a paragraph, especially when voice consistency, structure, and credibility matter.
agent-carnet
Use this skill when the user asks to save, recall, find, or organize notes. Triggers on: 'remember this', 'save this', 'note this', 'what did we discuss about...', 'check the notebook', 'find in carnet'. Also use proactively when discovering findings worth preserving across sessions.
deploy-docker-compose
Run the Omnigent server as a Docker compose stack (server + Postgres) on any Docker host — your laptop, a VPS, EC2 by hand, or as the base layer of any container-platform deploy. Invoke when the user wants to build the image, bring up the compose stack, debug the stack on a host they already have, or extend the stack…