Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/staruhub/crewclaw/code-review-checklistnpx skills add staruhub/CrewClaw --skill code-review-checklistgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/staruhub/CrewClawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/staruhub/crewclaw/code-review-checklist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/staruhub/crewclaw/code-review-checklist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/staruhub/crewclaw/code-review-checklist.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00206 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00103 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00041 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00021 |
Grade A, and why
code-review-checklist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review Checklist
Overview
Review the changed behavior, not only the edited lines.
When to Use
Use when the user asks for PR review, diff review, or merge readiness.
Workflow
- Identify base and changed files.
- Read nearby call sites for shared behavior.
- Separate blocking issues from suggestions.
- Check tests and missing coverage.
- Give a final recommendation.
Common Pitfalls
- Do not report style opinions as blockers.
- Do not assume tests passed without evidence.
- Do not review unrelated files unless the diff requires it.
Verification Checklist
- Findings cite concrete files or commands.
- Blocking issues are first.
- The merge recommendation is explicit.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 38 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A ccbb9033b60f
code-review-checklist is a skill published in the GitHub repository staruhub/CrewClaw (22 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 206 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
complete-partial-pr
Evaluate and complete an issue or PR where the submitted patch fixes only a narrow symptom of the reported pain point. Use when a contribution may miss adjacent integration surfaces, provider/spec semantics, roundtrip behavior, tests, docs, or historical maintainer decisions.
testing-skill
Record, rewrite, and debug VCR cassettes for HTTP recordings. Use when running tests with --record-mode, verifying cassette playback, or inspecting request/response bodies in YAML cassettes.
adding-a-provider-api-feature
Add a new provider API capability (prompt caching, strict/structured tool calling, thinking/reasoning effort, service tier, safety settings, logprobs, etc.) to Pydantic AI. Use when wiring a provider feature through the library — it enforces reasoning from the existing cross-provider abstraction before designing…
dws
【何时用:仅当用户明确指向钉钉/DingTalk(钉钉文档、钉钉日程等)时使用;泛指做文档/表格/待办/审批默认走本地工具,不要误用钉钉】用 dws CLI 管理钉钉:AI表格/AI搜问(找人首选)/目标管理(Agoal)/组织大脑/日历/通讯录/群聊与机器人消息/待办/审批/考勤/日志(日报周报)/DING消息/钉钉文档/云盘/Markdown文件/AI听记/邮箱/在线电子表格(axls)/知识库/白板/开放平台文档/个人IM与OA事件订阅。用户要求操作上述钉钉产品时使用。.
clip-hand-skill
Expert knowledge for AI video clipping — yt-dlp downloading, whisper transcription, SRT generation, and ffmpeg processing.
twitter-hand-skill
Expert knowledge for AI Twitter/X management — API v2 reference, content strategy, engagement playbook, safety, and performance tracking.