Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add stefan-stepzero/shipkit --skill shipkit-spec-roadmapgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/stefan-stepzero/shipkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/stefan-stepzero/shipkit/shipkit-spec-roadmap)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stefan-stepzero/shipkit/shipkit-spec-roadmap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stefan-stepzero/shipkit/shipkit-spec-roadmap/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stefan-stepzero/shipkit/shipkit-spec-roadmap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stefan-stepzero/shipkit/shipkit-spec-roadmap.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.02693 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.01077 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00539 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00269 |
Grade A, and why
shipkit-spec-roadmap scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 297 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
shipkit-spec-roadmap — Spec Prioritization Roadmap
Purpose: Bridge the gap between definitions and specs by building an explicit prioritization roadmap. Scores features by goal-gate phasing, dependency depth, foundation value, and mechanism complexity to determine spec order.
Output format: JSON — structured roadmap at .shipkit/spec-roadmap.json
When to Invoke
User triggers:
- "What should I spec first?"
- "Prioritize the features"
- "Create a spec roadmap"
- "Spec backlog"
- "What order should I write specs?"
Before:
/shipkit-spec(this determines WHICH spec to write next)
After:
/shipkit-product-definition(need features to prioritize)/shipkit-engineering-definition(need mechanisms for effort estimation)/shipkit-product-goals(recommended — gates drive phasing)
Workflow position:
- After definitions are complete, before writing individual specs
- Can be re-run after new features are added or priorities change
Prerequisites
Required:
.shipkit/product-definition.json— features to prioritize.shipkit/engineering-definition.json— mechanisms for effort estimation
Recommended:
.shipkit/goals/*.json— gate definitions for phase mapping (especiallygoals/strategic.jsonorgoals/product.json)
Optional:
.shipkit/specs/— detect already-specced features to mark as completed
If goals missing: Fall back to single-phase roadmap sorted by dependency + foundation value only.
Arguments
If $ARGUMENTS contains --update: Load existing spec-roadmap.json, refresh spec statuses, re-score, and present changes.
If $ARGUMENTS contains --regenerate: Discard existing roadmap and rebuild from scratch.
If $ARGUMENTS is empty: Check for existing file and offer choices.
Process
Step 0: Check Existing Roadmap
Fork context — no user prompts. You are dispatched in a fork and have no user channel. Skip the file-exists menu entirely.
- Read
.shipkit/spec-roadmap.json(if exists) - If
$ARGUMENTScontains--update: proceed to Step 1 with existing data as baseline - If
$ARGUMENTScontains--regenerateor no file exists: proceed to Step 1 fresh - If file exists and no argument: read
.shipkit/reviews/planning-assessment.jsonif present. If the latest review lists a gap against this artifact, archive the existing file to.shipkit/.archive/spec-roadmap.YYYY-MM-DD.jsonand regenerate addressing the gap. Otherwise, read the existing file and exit early with a "no changes needed" report — the reviewer already accepted it.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 297 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A bff8df566d4b
shipkit-spec-roadmap is a skill published in the GitHub repository stefan-stepzero/shipkit (1 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 2,693 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
anti-deception
Use before responding to pressure for agreement, manufactured urgency, authority appeals, or requests to certify unsupported claims; separate evidence from persuasion and state uncertainty.
stuck
Diagnoses a broken course setup by reading the folder, so the student never has to describe the problem in English. Takes no argument. Reports which class they are on and which files are filled, then names one blocker and one fix: Claude Code opened at the wrong level, .claude/skills/ missing, skills not loading…
wrap-up
Saves today's work session as a four-line entry (did, decided, open, next) at the top of the project's log.md, after the student confirms it, so a fresh chat can continue tomorrow with /pick-up. Writes to projects/ /log.md or career-vault/log.md, one entry per project touched, never to new-client. Use when the student…
pick-up
Reads the newest entry of a project's log.md and tells the student where they left off: what they did and decided, what is open, and the next step. Takes an optional project name. With several projects and no name, shows a menu of each project's last entry. Read only. Use when the student says pick up, where did I…
grill-me
One move you can run on anything: point grill-me at a target and it makes you defend your thinking from first principles until the true matter is clear. Point it at your working contract and it rewrites the weak lines in place. Point it at a brief and it produces a Requirements Handshake. Point it at research, an…
information-architecture
Map the user journey first, then derive the screen inventory, navigation and hierarchy from it, flagging any screen that serves no journey step. Writes the four-part markdown plus an HTML diagram of the step-to-screen mapping. Use after the brief is settled and before tokens or UI.