Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add stefanobaghino/simple-output-styles --skill pickgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/stefanobaghino/simple-output-stylesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/stefanobaghino/simple-output-styles/pick)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stefanobaghino/simple-output-styles/pick"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stefanobaghino/simple-output-styles/pick/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stefanobaghino/simple-output-styles/pick"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stefanobaghino/simple-output-styles/pick.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.00711 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00356 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00142 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00071 |
Grade B, and why
pick scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Reads agent configuration directoriesmediumAgent snooping
.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/ hold keys, settings and other credentials a mod has no legitimate need for.
1. Read `~/.claude/settings.json`. If the file does not exist, create it with How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 66 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Pick an output style
Get the user from a fresh install to an active style with one decision. You recommend a style, the user picks, and you set the choice in their global settings.
Step 1: recommend actionable-clarity
Open with the recommendation: actionable-clarity. In testing it wrote the answers that were easiest to understand, it kept more details than any other style, and it says "maybe" when a claim is unsure. Its one trade-off: answers run a little longer than Claude's normal output.
Ask the user one question: go with the recommendation, or see the other options? If the user already named a style, skip to step 3.
Step 2: the full list (only when asked)
Present the six styles, each with one line of spirit and its main pro and con in plain words:
- actionable-clarity (recommended) — answer first, every detail kept, honest about uncertainty. Clearest in testing; answers run a little longer.
- plain-language — familiar words, short sentences, reader first. Nearly as clear, with shorter answers and the best care for "maybe"; can cut details you need.
- developer-docs — the direct, conversational documentation voice. Clear, with answers about normal length; can sound more certain than it should.
- clarity-flow — reader-centered sentence craft: actors as subjects, actions as verbs. Keeps details very well and shortens answers; mid-pack on clarity.
- classic-concise — omit needless words. The shortest answers of any style; less clear than the leaders, and sometimes drops a "maybe".
- technical-simplified — controlled language built for procedure documents. In everyday chat it tested hardest to understand and dropped the most details; pick it only if you want that philosophy.
Let the user pick one, or none — stopping without a style is a fine outcome.
Step 3: set the style globally
- Read
~/.claude/settings.json. If the file does not exist, create it with an empty object first. - If
outputStyleis already set to another style, tell the user what is active and confirm the replacement before you write. - Set
outputStyleto the chosen style, in the plugin-qualified form that/configwrites, for example"outputStyle": "simple-output-styles:actionable-clarity". Change only that key and keep every other setting as it is. - Check that the file is still valid JSON after the edit.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 66 lines · 44 tokens per session scan B 413d44678b92
pick is a skill published in the GitHub repository stefanobaghino/simple-output-styles (16 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed 0BSD. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 711 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (reads agent configuration directories). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
release-notes
Generate and publish concise, evidence-based notes in the body of the latest existing GitHub Release. Use only when the user explicitly invokes $release-notes or explicitly asks to update the latest existing GitHub Release body. Do not invoke for general release planning, changelog, tag, or version tasks.
add-teams
Adds Microsoft Teams connector to a Power Apps code app. Use when sending Teams messages, posting to channels, or integrating with Teams chat.
sys-configure
Configure Claude Octopus — redirects to /octo:setup interactive wizard.
recipe-front-review
Reviews completed frontend implementation for governing-source compliance, scope economy, repository quality, and security, then applies user-approved React corrections.
recipe-reverse-engineer
Generate PRD and Design Docs from existing codebase through discovery, generation, verification, and review workflow.
37signals-way
Build lean, opinionated products using the 37signals philosophy from "Getting Real", "Rework", and "Shape Up". Use when the user mentions "Getting Real", "Rework", "Shape Up", "37signals", "Basecamp method", "six-week cycles", "fixed time variable scope", "appetite vs estimates", "betting table", "breadboarding", "fat…