prioritization-frameworks

prioritization-frameworks is a skill for Claude Code from stefanoskarakasis/Product-Marketing-Skills. It costs 89 tokens per session (3,553 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A decision aid that chooses and applies a suitable prioritization method, such as RICE, ICE, or a weighted decision table. These methods compare options using factors like impact, effort, risk, or confidence.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to rank initiatives, choose a launch tier from T1 to T4, or test whether more customer evidence is needed. It produces a scored recommendation and rationale.
Why use it?
It gives teams a consistent way to compare competing launches, roadmap items, or strategic choices. It also highlights weak evidence before turning a score into a launch tier.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: mentions .claude-plugin.

Part of the pmm-execution plugin — 8 skills, 8 commands shipped together

Good fit Use it to rank initiatives, choose a launch tier from T1 to T4, or test whether more customer evidence is needed. It produces a scored recommendation and rationale.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/stefanoskarakasis/product-marketing-skills/prioritization-frameworks
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add stefanoskarakasis/Product-Marketing-Skills --skill prioritization-frameworks
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/stefanoskarakasis/Product-Marketing-Skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install pmm-execution, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 8 skills, 8 commands.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for prioritization-frameworks

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stefanoskarakasis/product-marketing-skills/prioritization-frameworks/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/stefanoskarakasis/product-marketing-skills/prioritization-frameworks)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stefanoskarakasis/product-marketing-skills/prioritization-frameworks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stefanoskarakasis/product-marketing-skills/prioritization-frameworks/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for prioritization-frameworks

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stefanoskarakasis/product-marketing-skills/prioritization-frameworks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stefanoskarakasis/product-marketing-skills/prioritization-frameworks.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 89 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,553 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00089 $0.03553
Opus 5.5 $0.00036 $0.01421
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00018 $0.00711
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00355

Measured 11d ago against content hash bea8e6bc37d2, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

prioritization-frameworks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

pmm-execution/skills/prioritization-frameworks/SKILL.md · 348 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 348 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Prioritization-Frameworks — Skill

How This Works

Prioritization frameworks are decision tools, not prescriptions. Your job is to pick the right one for the question, apply it with integrity, and translate the output into a tier recommendation (T1–T4) that drives GTM resource allocation.

The skill runs in 7 core steps:

Step 0 — Load brain context (ICP, alternatives & positioning) and guardrails from /context/meta-patterns.md, if it exists (e.g., "frameworks without customer confidence >7 have led to prior T1 overstatements" — an example pattern shape, not a claim already observed).

Step 1 — Intake: Understand what you're deciding (launch tier? roadmap backlog? strategic choice?) and what signals you have.

Step 2 — Framework selection: Based on decision type and available data, recommend the right framework(s).

Step 3 — Scoring: Run the framework, surface Confidence weaknesses, apply Quality Gates.

Step 4 — Tier translation: Convert framework output to T1–T4 with one-sentence rationale.

Step 5 — Audit & recommendation: Pressure-test the tier assignment; deliver go/no-go on tier or recommend additional validation.

Step 6 — Output: Tier assignment card + scoring table + next step.

Step 7 — Learning Close: log the session to /context/skill-sessions.md.


Trigger

  • When: Choosing and applying a prioritization framework to score initiatives, backlog items, or strategic choices, and translating the result into a launch tier (T1–T4).
  • Not for: Assigning a launch tier directly from a GTM brief without a scoring pass → use go-to-market-strategy. Messaging hierarchy specifically → run Kano here, then hand off to positioning-messaging.
  • Example prompts:
    • "Help me prioritize this backlog"
    • "What framework should I use to decide between these two initiatives?"
    • "Score this with RICE"
    • "Which of these should we do first?"

Inputs

  • Args: What's being decided (launch tier, backlog, strategic choice), number of initiatives being compared, available signals, timeline, audience for the output. Free format — Step 1 intake fills gaps conversationally.
  • Defaults: If brain context is unavailable, this skill still runs — brain sharpens how "Opportunity" and "Impact" are interpreted, but is not a hard blocker.
  • Context keys:
    • /foundation/brain.md — optional but recommended. Sections 2 (ICP), 3 (Alternatives & Positioning).
  • /context/meta-patterns.md — optional; recurring patterns the user has logged from prior scoring sessions.
  • Brain contract: Reads Sections 2, 3. Writes: none — this skill does not write to /foundation/brain.md.

Read the full file on GitHub · 348 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago Changed · +4 lines · -1 tokens per session bea8e6bc37d2
  2. 19d ago Changed a66f494af96e
  3. 1mo ago Changed · -2 tokens per session ec98e4caf7c1
  4. 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines aa7ef91bfb98
  5. 2mo ago First seen · 342 lines · 92 tokens per session scan A e829270d5d54

Subscribe to this mod's changes

prioritization-frameworks is a skill published in the GitHub repository stefanoskarakasis/Product-Marketing-Skills (8 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 89 tokens to every session and 3,553 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

retro

Facilitate a structured sprint retrospective — what went well, what didn't, and prioritized action items with owners and deadlines. Use when running a retrospective, reflecting on a sprint, creating action items from team feedback, or learning how to run effective retros.

phuryn/pm-skills · 52 tokens

sprint-plan

Plan a sprint with capacity estimation, story selection, dependency mapping, and risk identification. Use when preparing for sprint planning, estimating team capacity, selecting stories, or balancing sprint scope against velocity.

phuryn/pm-skills · 42 tokens

review-resume

Comprehensive PM resume review and tailoring against 10 best practices including XYZ+S formula, keyword optimization, job-specific tailoring, and structure. Use when reviewing a PM resume, preparing for job applications, or improving resume impact.

phuryn/pm-skills · 49 tokens

job-stories

Create job stories using the 'When [situation], I want to [motivation], so I can [outcome]' format with detailed acceptance criteria. Use when writing job stories, creating JTBD-style backlog items, or expressing user situations and motivations.

phuryn/pm-skills · 55 tokens

wwas

Create product backlog items in Why-What-Acceptance format — independent, valuable, testable items with strategic context. Use when writing structured backlog items, breaking features into work items, or using the WWA format.

phuryn/pm-skills · 48 tokens

brainstorm-ideas-existing

Brainstorm product ideas for an existing product using multi-perspective ideation from PM, Designer, and Engineer viewpoints. Use when generating new feature ideas, brainstorming solutions for an identified opportunity, or ideating with a product trio.

phuryn/pm-skills · 51 tokens