Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/stefanthecode/dotnet-ai-toolkit/authorization-policy-generatornpx skills add StefanTheCode/dotnet-ai-toolkit --skill authorization-policy-generatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/StefanTheCode/dotnet-ai-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/stefanthecode/dotnet-ai-toolkit/authorization-policy-generator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stefanthecode/dotnet-ai-toolkit/authorization-policy-generator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stefanthecode/dotnet-ai-toolkit/authorization-policy-generator.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00094 | $0.00690 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00047 | $0.00345 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00138 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00069 |
Grade A, and why
authorization-policy-generator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 62 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Authorization Policy Generator
Design ASP.NET Core authorization the right way: named policies over scattered role strings, custom requirements/handlers for real rules, and resource-based checks for "can this user act on this object".
Input — point it at your project
Works on a target: a project or GitHub URL. Inspect current setup: grep -rn "AddAuthorization\|RequireRole\|RequireClaim\|\[Authorize\|RequireAuthorization\|IAuthorizationHandler" --include=*.cs <target>.
Named policies (not role strings everywhere)
builder.Services.AddAuthorizationBuilder()
.AddPolicy("CanManageOrders", p => p.RequireClaim("permission", "orders:manage"))
.AddPolicy("AdminOnly", p => p.RequireRole("Admin"))
.AddPolicy("Over18", p => p.AddRequirements(new MinimumAgeRequirement(18)));
Custom requirement + handler (real business rules)
public record MinimumAgeRequirement(int Age) : IAuthorizationRequirement;
public class MinimumAgeHandler : AuthorizationHandler<MinimumAgeRequirement>
{
protected override Task HandleRequirementAsync(AuthorizationHandlerContext ctx, MinimumAgeRequirement req)
{
var dob = ctx.User.FindFirst("dob")?.Value;
if (DateTime.TryParse(dob, out var d) && d.AddYears(req.Age) <= DateTime.Today)
ctx.Succeed(req);
return Task.CompletedTask;
}
}
builder.Services.AddSingleton<IAuthorizationHandler, MinimumAgeHandler>();
Resource-based (can THIS user act on THIS object)
var auth = await _authService.AuthorizeAsync(User, order, "OrderOwnerPolicy");
if (!auth.Succeeded) return Results.Forbid();
This is how you stop IDOR — ownership checked against the actual resource, not just a role.
Wiring endpoints
app.MapPost("/orders", ...).RequireAuthorization("CanManageOrders");
group.RequireAuthorization("AdminOnly");
// Consider a FallbackPolicy so endpoints are authenticated by default.
Principles
- Policies over inline role strings — one named policy, reused, easy to change.
- Requirements/handlers for business rules, not giant
if (User.IsInRole(...))blocks. - Resource-based authorization prevents IDOR — check ownership, not just role.
- Consider a fallback policy so new endpoints aren't accidentally anonymous.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 62 lines · 94 tokens per session scan A bd7f80055fe4
authorization-policy-generator is a skill published in the GitHub repository StefanTheCode/dotnet-ai-toolkit (19 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 94 tokens to every session and 690 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…