Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/stephenqiu30/stephen-claude/pullnpx skills add StephenQiu30/stephen-claude --skill pullgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/StephenQiu30/stephen-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/stephenqiu30/stephen-claude/pull)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stephenqiu30/stephen-claude/pull"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stephenqiu30/stephen-claude/pull.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00051 | $0.01039 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00519 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00208 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00104 |
Grade A, and why
pull scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to pull — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 101 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Pull
Workflow
- Verify git status is clean or commit/stash changes before merging.
- Ensure rerere is enabled locally:
git config rerere.enabled truegit config rerere.autoupdate true
- Confirm remotes and branches:
- Ensure the
originremote exists. - Ensure the current branch is the one to receive the merge.
- Ensure the
- Fetch latest refs:
git fetch origin
- Sync the remote feature branch first:
git pull --ff-only origin $(git branch --show-current)- This pulls branch updates made remotely (for example, a GitHub auto-commit)
before merging
origin/main.
- Merge in order:
- Prefer
git -c merge.conflictstyle=zdiff3 merge origin/mainfor clearer conflict context.
- Prefer
- If conflicts appear, resolve them (see conflict guidance below), then:
git add <files>git commit(orgit merge --continueif the merge is paused)
- Verify with project checks (follow repo policy in
AGENTS.md). - Summarize the merge:
- Call out the most challenging conflicts/files and how they were resolved.
- Note any assumptions or follow-ups.
Conflict Resolution Guidance (Best Practices)
- Inspect context before editing:
- Use
git statusto list conflicted files. - Use
git difforgit diff --mergeto see conflict hunks. - Use
git diff :1:path/to/file :2:path/to/fileandgit diff :1:path/to/file :3:path/to/fileto compare base vs ours/theirs for a file-level view of intent. - With
merge.conflictstyle=zdiff3, conflict markers include:<<<<<<<ours,|||||||base,=======split,>>>>>>>theirs.- Matching lines near the start/end are trimmed out of the conflict region, so focus on the differing core.
- Summarize the intent of both changes, decide the semantically correct
outcome, then edit:
- State what each side is trying to achieve (bug fix, refactor, rename, behavior change).
- Identify the shared goal, if any, and whether one side supersedes the other.
- Decide the final behavior first; only then craft the code to match that decision.
- Prefer preserving invariants, API contracts, and user-visible behavior unless the conflict clearly indicates a deliberate change.
- Open files and understand intent on both sides before choosing a resolution.
- Use
- Prefer minimal, intention-preserving edits:
- Keep behavior consistent with the branch’s purpose.
- Avoid accidental deletions or silent behavior changes.
- Resolve one file at a time and rerun tests after each logical batch.
- Use
ours/theirsonly when you are certain one side should win entirely. - For complex conflicts, search for related files or definitions to align with the rest of the codebase.
- For generated files, resolve non-generated conflicts first, then regenerate:
- Prefer resolving source files and handwritten logic before touching generated artifacts.
- Run the CLI/tooling command that produced the generated file to recreate it cleanly, then stage the regenerated output.
- For import conflicts where intent is unclear, accept both sides first:
- Keep all candidate imports temporarily, finish the merge, then run lint/type checks to remove unused or incorrect imports safely.
- After resolving, ensure no conflict markers remain:
git diff --check
- When unsure, note assumptions and ask for confirmation before finalizing the merge.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 101 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 7aa0ef5cd877
pull is a skill published in the GitHub repository StephenQiu30/stephen-claude (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 1,039 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to pull, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr-review-triage
Watch open PRs, check CI status, review staleness, merge conflicts, and unanswered review comments. Produces a prioritized watchlist.
happiness-skill
当用户问「怎么才能更幸福/为什么得到了还不满足/怎么减少焦虑」时调用。 核心理念: 幸福是缺憾感清空的默认状态, 是可训练的技能; 欲望是与自己的契约(得到前不快乐), 同时只留一个重大欲望; 活在当下。 不适用于: 临床抑郁等需要专业治疗的场景(本书方法不能替代医疗)。 Triggers: 幸福/不快乐/欲望/焦虑/知足/活在当下/happiness/desire/anxiety.
monkey-mind-meditation
当用户脑子停不下来、焦虑反刍、想学冥想/提升专注力时调用。 核心理念: 内心独白(心猴)是失控程序不是"我"; 用调试模式逐条观察念头, 意识到即失去控制; 冥想=收件箱归零/心灵间歇性禁食。 不适用于: 严重精神疾病急性发作(先就医); 需要立刻处理的实际问题(先做事)。 Triggers: 冥想/焦虑/脑子停不下来/胡思乱想/专注/心猴/monkey mind/meditation/anxiety.
peer-selection
当用户纠结交朋友/选伴侣/换圈子、感觉被周围人拖累、问「该不该疏远某人」时调用。 核心理念: 五只黑猩猩理论(你的行为由最常接触的5人预测); 同伴是主动选择而非巧合; 只与价值观一致者深交, 远离愤世嫉俗者/愤怒者。 不适用于: 职场必须共事的同事关系(可先设边界)。 Triggers: 朋友/圈子/伴侣/该不该疏远/被拖累/五只黑猩猩/peer/friends/circle/values.
dependency-triage
Scan package manifests and lockfiles for outdated and vulnerable dependencies. Classify by severity and update type.
draft-release-notes
Turn changelog-scan output into polished, categorized release notes draft. Propose only.