Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add SteveGJones/ai-first-sdlc-practices --skill change-impact-annotategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SteveGJones/ai-first-sdlc-practicesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/stevegjones/ai-first-sdlc-practices/change-impact-annotate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stevegjones/ai-first-sdlc-practices/change-impact-annotate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stevegjones/ai-first-sdlc-practices/change-impact-annotate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stevegjones/ai-first-sdlc-practices/change-impact-annotate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stevegjones/ai-first-sdlc-practices/change-impact-annotate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.00439 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00219 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00088 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
change-impact-annotate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Skill: change-impact-annotate
Use this skill before pushing a code change that touches a regulated-context project where change_impact_gate is enabled. Produces a docs/change-impacts/CHG-NNN.md record that satisfies the gate.
Inputs
- The unstaged or just-staged code changes (read from
git diff)
Steps
-
Inspect the diff. Identify the touched files and (best-effort) the touched functions.
-
Map files to module IDs using
programs.yaml. -
Map touched functions to cited artefact IDs by parsing existing
# implements:annotations. -
Compute the next CHG number. Scan
docs/change-impacts/CHG-*.md; new ID = max + 1. -
Generate a draft. Use the
change-impact.mdtemplate, pre-filled with:- Discovered REQs, DESs, TESTs, code locations, modules
- Empty fields for: change summary, downstream effects, verification approach, approver
-
Prompt the user to fill in the empty fields. Surface verification approach as the highest-stakes field (this is the regulator's primary check).
-
Save. Write to
docs/change-impacts/CHG-<NNN>.md. -
Re-run change_impact_gate to verify the record covers all touched code files.
-
Remind. "Approval signature is required before merge — the framework records it; the human authorises it."
Done criteria
CHG-<NNN>.mdwritten.- All touched code files cited in the record.
change_impact_gatepasses.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 43 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 885ae4b848f9
change-impact-annotate is a skill published in the GitHub repository SteveGJones/ai-first-sdlc-practices (41 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 439 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…