Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/stevegjones/ai-first-sdlc-practices/code-annotatenpx skills add SteveGJones/ai-first-sdlc-practices --skill code-annotategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SteveGJones/ai-first-sdlc-practicesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/stevegjones/ai-first-sdlc-practices/code-annotate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stevegjones/ai-first-sdlc-practices/code-annotate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stevegjones/ai-first-sdlc-practices/code-annotate.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00520 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00260 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00104 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
code-annotate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 52 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Skill: code-annotate
Use this skill when adding implementation code that satisfies a REQ or DES. Generates the correct # implements: annotation, validates that the cited IDs exist in the registry, and inserts the annotation in a syntactically-correct place.
Inputs
<artefact-id>— the REQ or DES being implemented (e.g.,REQ-auth-001,DES-auth-001, orP1.SP2.M3.REQ-007)- File path and function name (from active editing context)
Steps
-
Verify the artefact exists. Read
library/_ids.md; confirm<artefact-id>is declared. -
Detect the language. Python (
#), JavaScript/TypeScript (//), Go (//), Rust (//). Default#if unknown. -
Determine the comment line. Choose the comment syntax matching the file extension.
-
Insert the annotation. Place
<comment-prefix> implements: <artefact-id>as the first line of the function body, immediately after the opening brace /:/func ... {. -
Confirm. Show the diff to the user.
-
Run annotation_format_integrity on the file to verify the annotation parses correctly.
Annotation placement rules
<!-- implements: <DES-ID> --> and # implements: <DES-ID> annotations ALWAYS go on the implementing artefact:
- A Python function body — first line of the body, comment form
- A SKILL.md file — immediately after frontmatter close
---, HTML-comment form - A governance document — YAML frontmatter
satisfies_by_existence: [...]orimplements: [...]
NEVER place annotations:
- Inside a design-spec.md DES element (the DES is what is satisfied, not what implements)
- Inside a requirements-spec.md REQ element
- Inside a test-spec.md TEST element
The spec layer expresses obligation; the implementing artefact carries evidence. Crossing the layers blurs the audit trail.
Done criteria
- Annotation inserted in syntactically-correct location.
- annotation_format_integrity passes.
- One commit with the annotation; the implementing code is the user's responsibility.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 52 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A f780f28d241e
code-annotate is a skill published in the GitHub repository SteveGJones/ai-first-sdlc-practices (41 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 520 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…