Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add stevesolun/ctx --skill to-issuesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/stevesolun/ctxWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/stevesolun/ctx/to-issues)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stevesolun/ctx/to-issues"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stevesolun/ctx/to-issues/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stevesolun/ctx/to-issues"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stevesolun/ctx/to-issues.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.00785 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00314 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00157 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00078 |
Grade A, and why
to-issues scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- to-issues — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- to-issues — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- to-issues — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- to-issues — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- to-issues — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- to-issues — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- to-issues — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- to-issues — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 84 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
To Issues
Break a plan into independently-grabbable issues using vertical slices (tracer bullets).
The issue tracker and triage label vocabulary should have been provided to you — run /setup-matt-pocock-skills if not.
Process
1. Gather context
Work from whatever is already in the conversation context. If the user passes an issue reference (issue number, URL, or path) as an argument, fetch it from the issue tracker and read its full body and comments.
2. Explore the codebase (optional)
If you have not already explored the codebase, do so to understand the current state of the code. Issue titles and descriptions should use the project's domain glossary vocabulary, and respect ADRs in the area you're touching.
3. Draft vertical slices
Break the plan into tracer bullet issues. Each issue is a thin vertical slice that cuts through ALL integration layers end-to-end, NOT a horizontal slice of one layer.
Slices may be 'HITL' or 'AFK'. HITL slices require human interaction, such as an architectural decision or a design review. AFK slices can be implemented and merged without human interaction. Prefer AFK over HITL where possible.
4. Quiz the user
Present the proposed breakdown as a numbered list. For each slice, show:
- Title: short descriptive name
- Type: HITL / AFK
- Blocked by: which other slices (if any) must complete first
- User stories covered: which user stories this addresses (if the source material has them)
Ask the user:
- Does the granularity feel right? (too coarse / too fine)
- Are the dependency relationships correct?
- Should any slices be merged or split further?
- Are the correct slices marked as HITL and AFK?
Iterate until the user approves the breakdown.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 84 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 0e6a2973fa5b
to-issues is a skill published in the GitHub repository stevesolun/ctx (589 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 785 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
operator-scorecard
Three recap modes - default synthesizes agent health, community growth, and economic activity into a was-it-worth-it verdict; ops recaps what shipped and failed; push ranks push impact.
github-monitor
Watch your GitHub repos across four views - a combined urgency monitor (stale PRs, new issues, releases), a new-issue triage queue, a release upgrade digest, or your own opened-PR tracker.
heartbeat
Ambient fleet-health check that surfaces anything worth attention (default), or an on-demand priority brief - the 3 things to focus on, why now, and what moved (var=brief).
shiplog
Recap of everything shipped since the last run - cross-repo PRs, security fixes, star deltas, and X traction, synthesized into a digest article and a ready-to-post shiplog in your voice.
idea-pipeline
Execution-gap audit - cross-references the startup idea backlog against shipped skills, prototypes, and cross-repo PRs, surfacing the top 3 ideas to build next by narrative and operator fit.
strategy-builder
Draft STRATEGY.md from a goal - read the operator's brief (goal, repo, links) plus the repo README and memory, then write a tight north-star/priorities/audience/constraints strategy.