Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Stijnman/grok-custom-skills --skill user-preference-profilergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Stijnman/grok-custom-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/stijnman/grok-custom-skills/user-preference-profiler)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stijnman/grok-custom-skills/user-preference-profiler"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stijnman/grok-custom-skills/user-preference-profiler/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stijnman/grok-custom-skills/user-preference-profiler"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stijnman/grok-custom-skills/user-preference-profiler.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00300 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00150 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00060 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
user-preference-profiler scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
User Preference Profiler
When to Use
- User says my preferences or task matches this capability
- User says remember how I like or task matches this capability
- User says user profile or task matches this capability
- User says personalize or task matches this capability
Workflow
- Extract preferences from conversation (tone, format, tools).
- Merge with persistent-memory-bridge store.
- Apply profile to current task defaults.
- Confirm major preference changes with user.
Integrations
persistent-memory-bridgesemantic-memory-manager
Error Handling
| Failure | Response |
|---|---|
| Conflicting prefs | Ask user to resolve. |
Gotchas
- Preferences are suggestions, not overrides for safety rules.
Example
Input: User request matching triggers above. Output: Structured result per workflow with integrations invoked as needed.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 47 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 75ad57d1c731
user-preference-profiler is a skill published in the GitHub repository Stijnman/grok-custom-skills (9 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 300 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
distill-feedback
A process for turning corrections you give an agent into lasting working rules. It reviews saved conversations and asks for approval before changing those rules.
contextpilot
Optimize document ordering in LLM context for better retrieval performance.
faf-expert
Expert in .faf (Foundational AI-context Format) files for persistent project context. Use when working with .faf files, project DNA, CLAUDE.md bi-sync, faf-cli commands, MCP server configuration, or AI-readiness scoring (0-100%). Updated for v2.8.0 Tool Visibility System.
goal-meta-skill
A guide for turning an unclear or complex task into a reviewable /goal instruction for coding agents.
knowledge-base
Retrieves and updates project-specific prompt knowledge from comparison evidence and user feedback. Use only for prompt analysis or post-comparison learning within a Rashomon evaluation.
obsidian-vault
Create, edit, and audit notes in an Obsidian vault. Handles frontmatter properties, wikilinks, embeds, callouts, tasks, block references, tags, and Mermaid diagrams. Plugin-aware: Dataview queries and inline fields, Tasks emoji syntax, Kanban boards, Meta Bind fields, Templater templates, Bases schemas, and Canvas…