Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to stoa-platform/stoa. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/stoa-platform/stoa/main/.claude/skills/ci-fix/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/stoa-platform/stoaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/stoa-platform/stoa/ci-fix)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stoa-platform/stoa/ci-fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stoa-platform/stoa/ci-fix/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stoa-platform/stoa/ci-fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stoa-platform/stoa/ci-fix.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.01183 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00473 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00237 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00118 |
Grade A, and why
ci-fix scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 139 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CI Fix — Auto-remediate CI Failures
Context dynamique
- Branch courante: !
git branch --show-current - Checks PR en cours: !
gh pr checks 2>/dev/null | head -20 - Workflows recents: !
gh run list --limit 5 --json name,status,conclusion,headBranch --template '{{range .}}{{.name}} | {{.status}} | {{.conclusion}} | {{.headBranch}}{{"\n"}}{{end}}' 2>/dev/null
Instructions
Auto-fix CI failure for: $ARGUMENTS
Step 1: Identify failing checks
If PR number:
gh pr checks $ARGUMENTS
gh run list --branch $(gh pr view $ARGUMENTS --json headRefName -q .headRefName) --limit 3
If workflow run URL or ID:
gh run view $ARGUMENTS --log-failed
Step 2: Read error logs
# Get the failed run ID, then read logs
gh run view <run-id> --log-failed 2>&1 | head -200
Step 3: Classify — auto-fixable or manual?
Auto-fixable (proceed to Step 4):
| Check | Error pattern | Fix command |
|---|---|---|
| Python lint (ruff) | Found N errors |
cd <component> && ruff check --fix . |
| Python format (black) | would reformat |
cd <component> && black . |
| Python import order | I001 |
cd <component> && ruff check --fix --select I . |
| TS/JS lint (eslint) | N problems (N errors, N warnings) |
cd <component> && npm run lint -- --fix |
| TS/JS format (prettier) | Code style issues |
cd <component> && npx prettier --write . |
| Rust format | Diff in |
cd stoa-gateway && cargo fmt |
| Rust clippy (simple) | warning: with help: ... suggestion |
cd stoa-gateway && cargo clippy --fix --allow-dirty |
NOT auto-fixable (report and STOP):
| Category | Examples |
|---|---|
| Logic errors | Test assertions failing, wrong behavior |
| Test failures | vitest/pytest/cargo test failures |
| Security issues | Gitleaks, Bandit findings, SAST violations |
| Type errors (complex) | Missing interfaces, wrong generics |
| Build errors | Missing dependencies, Docker build failures |
| Infrastructure | K8s deploy, ArgoCD, Helm issues |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 139 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 6eb5f023cc74
ci-fix is a skill published in the GitHub repository stoa-platform/stoa (9 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 1,183 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
ci-fix compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ci-fixstoa-platform/stoa | Skill | 9 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| meta-long-running-build-watchdogopensquilla/opensquilla | Skill | 7.1k | 6d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 131 | Claude Code |
| ci-debugyonatangross/orchestkit | Skill | 299 | yesterday | MIT | A | 55 | Claude Code |
| lyrikgebruder/wirken | Skill | 194 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 15 | Claude Code |
| librariangebruder/wirken | Skill | 194 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 34 | Claude Code |
| notesgebruder/wirken | Skill | 194 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 10 | Claude Code |
| tdx-assetsgebruder/wirken | Skill | 194 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 58 | Claude Code |