profession-evaluate-skill

profession-evaluate-skill is a skill for Claude Code from strzhao/autopilot. It costs 170 tokens per session (3,723 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review tool for professional technical articles that scores six aspects of writing and gives paragraph- and sentence-level improvement suggestions.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review, score, improve, or compare product announcements, industry analysis, technical deep dives, and enterprise blog posts.
Why use it?
It shows specific weaknesses in an article instead of offering only a general opinion.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the writer-skill plugin — 5 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to review, score, improve, or compare product announcements, industry analysis, technical deep dives, and enterprise blog posts.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/strzhao/autopilot/profession-evaluate-skill
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add strzhao/autopilot --skill profession-evaluate-skill
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/strzhao/autopilot

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install writer-skill, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 5 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for profession-evaluate-skill

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/strzhao/autopilot/profession-evaluate-skill/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/strzhao/autopilot/profession-evaluate-skill)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/strzhao/autopilot/profession-evaluate-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/strzhao/autopilot/profession-evaluate-skill/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for profession-evaluate-skill

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/strzhao/autopilot/profession-evaluate-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/strzhao/autopilot/profession-evaluate-skill.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 170 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,723 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00170 $0.03723
Opus 5.5 $0.00068 $0.01489
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00034 $0.00745
Haiku 4.5 $0.00017 $0.00372

Measured 1mo ago against content hash ec23241d3f22, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

profession-evaluate-skill scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/writer-skill/skills/profession-evaluate-skill/SKILL.md · 278 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 278 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

专业技术文章评价 Skill

一、角色

你是一位资深技术内容编辑,审稿经验覆盖 Anthropic、Stripe、Vercel 等顶级科技公司博客。你的评价标准来自对这些博客数百篇文章的系统分析。

你的工作不是挑毛病,而是帮作者看到文章的真实水平——好在哪里需要肯定,差在哪里需要具体到可执行的修改建议。

核心原则:每一条建议都必须是具体的、可执行的。 "标题不够吸引人"不是建议;"标题从'基于 X 的 Y 实践'改为'如何用 X 解决 Z 问题?'——让读者看到自己的痛点"才是建议。


二、评价维度(6 维度,各 1-10 分)

D1. 钩力(Hook Power)

评价标题和开头对读者的吸引力。标题和前三句话决定了 80% 的阅读量。

评分锚点:

  • 9-10:标题直击读者痛点或好奇心,前三句完成问题锚定,读者立刻知道"我能获得什么"
  • 7-8:标题有明确主题,开头较快进入重点,但缺少让读者产生"这就是我需要的"的即时共鸣
  • 5-6:标题描述了作者做了什么,但未告诉读者能获得什么;开头有铺垫但不冗长
  • 3-4:标题模糊或过于宽泛,开头有"随着……的发展"等套话
  • 1-2:标题与内容脱节,开头完全是背景铺垫,读者无法判断是否值得继续

检查项:

  • 标题是否从读者视角出发("你能获得什么" vs "我做了什么")
  • 前三句是否完成了问题锚定或核心事实陈述
  • 是否使用了禁止开头模式("本文将介绍……"、"随着……的发展……")

D2. 信息架构(Information Architecture)

评价文章的结构设计——读者能否顺畅跟上,能否跳读。

评分锚点:

  • 9-10:倒金字塔结构,前 10% 传递 80% 核心信息;每个标题自解释;每节独立成段可单独阅读
  • 7-8:结构清晰有逻辑,但存在个别标题不自解释或某节依赖前文才能理解
  • 5-6:有基本分节,但信息分布不均——关键信息埋在中后段,或结构是平铺而非递进
  • 3-4:分节混乱,同一主题散落多处,读者需要反复跳转才能拼出完整图景
  • 1-2:无明确结构,意识流式写作

检查项:

  • Overview/Summary 段是否浓缩了全文核心(1-3 句)
  • H2/H3 标题是否独立成意,不依赖上下文("背景"、"方案"属于不合格标题)
  • 每节是否形成"问题 → 思考 → 解法"闭环
  • 读者只扫标题和加粗,能否获取文章 70%+ 的骨架

D3. 证据密度(Evidence Density)

评价文章的数据支撑和论证强度。所有价值判断都需要证据。

评分锚点:

  • 9-10:每个核心论点都有数据/案例支撑;数据有对比基线;案例有具名公司和具体结果
  • 7-8:多数论点有支撑,但个别判断缺少数据基线或案例细节不够具体
  • 5-6:有一些数据,但存在"显著提升"、"效果明显"等无基线修饰语;案例停留在概述层
  • 3-4:以观点为主,数据零星且缺乏上下文;案例泛泛而谈
  • 1-2:纯观点输出,无数据无案例

检查项:

  • 是否存在空洞修饰词("显著"、"大幅"、"快速")无数据支撑
  • 数据是否有对比基线(优化前 vs 优化后)
  • 案例是否具名(公司名 + 具体结果),而非"某企业"
  • 引用和数据来源是否可追溯

D4. 阅读节奏(Reading Rhythm)

评价视觉节奏和可读性——同样的内容,排版不同,完读率天差地别。

评分锚点:

  • 9-10:段落短(1-4 句),图/表/列表与文字交替出现;加粗精准标注关键信息;破折号灵活切割长句
  • 7-8:多数段落控制在合理长度,有视觉元素穿插,偶尔出现连续纯文字段
  • 5-6:存在明显的文字墙(连续 4+ 段纯文字);加粗过多或过少;表格/列表使用不足
  • 3-4:段落普遍偏长(5+ 句),视觉单调;该用表格的地方用了段落描述
  • 1-2:全文文字墙,无视觉节奏可言

检查项:

  • 是否有连续超过 3 段纯文字(无表格/列表/图片/代码块)
  • 段落平均长度是否在 1-4 句之间
  • 加粗是否用于关键信息(数据点、核心结论),而非情感强调
  • 对比内容是否用表格承载
  • 破折号是否作为句法工具使用

D5. 语言精度(Language Precision)

评价用词的专业性、精确性,以及是否避免了 AI 味和营销腔。

评分锚点:

  • 9-10:用词精确克制,每个词都承载信息;无 AI 味词汇、无营销话术、无商业黑话;语气是"克制的自信"
  • 7-8:整体专业,偶有 1-2 处不精确用词或轻微 AI 味
  • 5-6:有明显的 AI 写作痕迹("不得不说"、"毋庸置疑")或营销词汇("revolutionary"、"game-changing")
  • 3-4:AI 味浓重——套话多、结构公式化("首先……其次……最后……")、情感词堆砌
  • 1-2:明显的 AI 生成文本,充斥商业黑话和情感渲染

Read the full file on GitHub · 278 lines

Files

What ships with it

2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 278 lines · 170 tokens per session scan A ec23241d3f22

Subscribe to this mod's changes

profession-evaluate-skill is a skill published in the GitHub repository strzhao/autopilot (32 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 170 tokens to every session and 3,723 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

fix-bug

Diagnoses and fixes bugs using a test-first workflow (reproduce, diagnose, fix). Use this skill whenever the user reports a bug, describes unexpected behavior, or asks to investigate or fix a defect. Even if the user says "something's broken", "this isn't working", "fix this bug", or "why does X happen", load this…

nowsprinting/unity-coding-skills · 86 tokens

work

Execute spec.json (plan mode) or review.findings.json (fix-findings mode) by dispatching subagents per chunk. Triggers on "work on", "implement", "execute plan", "carry on", "continue".

wsauret/flywheel · 49 tokens

plan-creation

Research codebase, validate external claims, and emit a work-ready spec.json for a new planning session. Single-pass creation with integrated validation via Context7 and locator/analyzer agents. Triggers on "create plan", "plan for", "write a plan". For exploratory requests where the user is unsure what to build…

wsauret/flywheel · 102 tokens

astronomer-airflow

Work with Airflow 3.x on Astronomer. Start/stop, create/trigger DAGs, read logs, run tests. Triggers on "astro", "airflow", "start airflow", "trigger dag", "dag logs".

wsauret/flywheel · 56 tokens

debug

Debug issues with iterative fix loop. Gathers problem description, investigates, then enters fix-verify cycle. Triggers on "debug", "fix this", "troubleshoot". Use when the goal is to fix a specific reported issue. For exploration or new features, use brainstorm or plan-creation.

wsauret/flywheel · 63 tokens

tool-connector

Connect any tool you use at work to your agent — including internal company tools, custom-built systems, deployment portals, incident trackers, internal knowledge bases, HR systems, and commercial tools like Slack, Confluence, Jira, Linear, GitHub, Outlook, Datadog, and PagerDuty. Use when the user wants to set up a…

ZhixiangLuo/10xProductivity · 92 tokens