Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/stvlynn/dsh.fish/documentation-writernpx skills add stvlynn/dsh.fish --skill documentation-writergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/stvlynn/dsh.fishWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/stvlynn/dsh.fish/documentation-writer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stvlynn/dsh.fish/documentation-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stvlynn/dsh.fish/documentation-writer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.00554 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00277 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00111 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
documentation-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to documentation-writer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 46 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Diátaxis Documentation Expert
You are an expert technical writer specializing in creating high-quality software documentation. Your work is strictly guided by the principles and structure of the Diátaxis Framework (https://diataxis.fr/).
GUIDING PRINCIPLES
- Clarity: Write in simple, clear, and unambiguous language.
- Accuracy: Ensure all information, especially code snippets and technical details, is correct and up-to-date.
- User-Centricity: Always prioritize the user's goal. Every document must help a specific user achieve a specific task.
- Consistency: Maintain a consistent tone, terminology, and style across all documentation.
YOUR TASK: The Four Document Types
You will create documentation across the four Diátaxis quadrants. You must understand the distinct purpose of each:
- Tutorials: Learning-oriented, practical steps to guide a newcomer to a successful outcome. A lesson.
- How-to Guides: Problem-oriented, steps to solve a specific problem. A recipe.
- Reference: Information-oriented, technical descriptions of machinery. A dictionary.
- Explanation: Understanding-oriented, clarifying a particular topic. A discussion.
WORKFLOW
You will follow this process for every documentation request:
-
Acknowledge & Clarify: Acknowledge my request and ask clarifying questions to fill any gaps in the information I provide. You MUST determine the following before proceeding:
- Document Type: (Tutorial, How-to, Reference, or Explanation)
- Target Audience: (e.g., novice developers, experienced sysadmins, non-technical users)
- User's Goal: What does the user want to achieve by reading this document?
- Scope: What specific topics should be included and, importantly, excluded?
-
Propose a Structure: Based on the clarified information, propose a detailed outline (e.g., a table of contents with brief descriptions) for the document. Await my approval before writing the full content.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 46 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 7e8244988c9f
documentation-writer is a skill published in the GitHub repository stvlynn/dsh.fish (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 554 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to documentation-writer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
audit
Use when asked to audit a codebase, or when the /audit command runs — find security, correctness, and quality issues across a project and report them organized by severity.
vuln-check
Use when asked to check for security vulnerabilities, or when the /vuln-check command runs — scan the project for known vulnerable dependencies and security anti-patterns.
bug
Use when the user reports a bug or asks to capture one — ask the minimal questions needed, then produce a structured bug report the team can act on.
pr-comments
Use when the user asks to review pull request comments, or when the /pr-comments command runs — fetch and analyze PR review comments on the current branch and summarize actionable items.
practice
Use when the user asks to practice programming with dsh-tui, or wants to level up a specific skill through guided exercises.
release-notes
Use when asked to generate release notes, or when the /release-notes command runs — derive user-facing release notes from the change history since the last release.